TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
T20 Blast: Nottinghamshire vs Lancashire
kalshi
polymarket

What is the result of Nottinghamshire vs Lancashire?

Volume:
$1,229,175

Nottinghamshire

 - Kalshi

Nottinghamshire - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 4:50 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Nottinghamshire

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$380,182
N/A
N/A
$92,417
Settled
Yes
polymarket

T20 Blast: Nottinghamshire vs Lancashire

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$126,236
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

T20 Blast: Nottinghamshire vs Lancashire - Completed match?

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
87.3¢
N/A
$147
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Lancashire

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$722,540
N/A
N/A
$310,979
Settled
No
polymarket

T20 Blast: Nottinghamshire vs Lancashire - Who wins the toss?

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$69
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 5

Intro

This market tracks whether Nottinghamshire will defeat Lancashire in their T20 Blast cricket match. Aggregated data from Kalshi and Polymarket shows a consensus probability of 99.9% for match completion. Resolution will be determined by ESPNcricinfo, the authoritative source for cricket statistics. Watch for the scheduled match on July 3, 2026 at 1:30 PM EDT to see if the contest concludes as expected.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi match winner market contains a logical contradiction: both possible outcomes (Nottinghamshire win and Lancashire win) resolve to Yes, making the market fundamentally unresolvable and unhedgeable. Polymarket match winner market is logically sound.Hero tip: Do not trade the Kalshi match winner market. It is unresolvable by design. Focus on Polymarket's match winner, toss winner, and completion markets, which all use consistent ESPNcricinfo sourcing and clear edge-case handling.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Match winner market states: 'If Nottinghamshire wins...then Yes' AND 'If Lancashire wins...then Yes'. This creates a logical impossibility where every outcome resolves Yes, violating binary market semantics.
  • Polymarket: Match winner resolves to the finalized result per ESPNcricinfo. Explicit handling: Super Over tiebreaks resolve to the tiebreak winner; no-result/abandoned matches resolve 50-50. Toss winner and completion markets use identical ESPNcricinfo sourcing with clear edge cases for postponement, cancellation, and no official result.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the cricket match between Nottinghamshire and Lancashire scheduled for July 3 2026 in T20 Blast. This market resolves according to the finalized match result as published by https://www.espncricinfo.com/. DLS/DRS, over-rate penalties, forfeit/walkover, or any other on-field ruling that leads the competition to declare a winner are treated as ordinary wins. If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available under the playing conditions (e.g., group-stage ODI with no Super Over), the market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed/rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed. If the match is permanently canceled or abandoned or otherwise is completed without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Kalshi

Resolution depends on an official winner being declared by the governing body. If the match concludes with a decisive result, the winning team resolves to Yes. Ties, draws, no results, abandonments, or cancellations without an official winner all resolve to $0.50. Forfeits, disqualifications, or concessions occurring before play begins also resolve to $0.50; if they occur after play has begun and an official winner is declared, that result determines resolution. If play commences but insufficient play occurs to establish an official result, all markets resolve to $0.50.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and extract margin, while prediction markets reflect real-time trader consensus without a built-in house edge. On this market, you can compare the implied probabilities directly: prediction market prices show what traders collectively believe will happen, whereas sportsbook odds include vigorish. Prediction markets often react faster to breaking news—injuries, weather, team news—because traders profit from being first to reprice. For this fixture, checking both sources reveals whether sharp money is moving in one direction.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader bases, regulatory frameworks, and liquidity pools. Kalshi operates under CFTC oversight with distinct user demographics, while Polymarket draws global crypto-native traders. Differences in trading fees, interface design, and settlement speed can create temporary price gaps. If one platform receives a large order or experiences lower volume, its odds may lag the other. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these spreads, but during low-liquidity periods, meaningful divergence can persist. Monitoring both venues helps identify which platform is pricing this market more efficiently.

Key catalysts include team news—injuries to star players, lineup changes, or surprise inclusions—which can shift win probability significantly. Weather forecasts for the match day may favor one team's playing style or bowling attack. Recent form and head-to-head records often trigger repricing as traders reassess historical patterns. Venue conditions, pitch reports, and toss outcomes are powerful real-time signals. Social media sentiment and expert commentary can also influence trader positioning. Large bets from recognized sharp accounts often move odds sharply, signaling informed conviction about team performance or specific match factors.