TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$113,466,932
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,423,222,590
402,751
Markets across
30,217
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,632
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 4, 7:19 AM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks the outcome of the League of Legends match between T1 and Bilibili Gaming at the Mid-Season Invitational 2026. Across Kalshi and Limitless, the aggregated consensus shows Bilibili Gaming at 99.0% to win, with T1 at 1.0%. The resolution source is the official result of the match scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 4:00 AM EDT. Watch for the match outcome on July 4, 2026, which will determine final settlement across both platforms.
If T1 wins the Mid-Season Invitational 2026: T1 vs. Bilibili Gaming League of Legends match originally scheduled for Jul 4, 2026 at 4:00 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If Bilibili Gaming wins the Mid-Season Invitational 2026: T1 vs. Bilibili Gaming League of Legends match originally scheduled for Jul 4, 2026 at 4:00 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.
This market refers to the match between Bilibili Gaming and T1 in the Mid-Season Invitational 2026, scheduled for Jul 4, 2026. This market resolves to "YES" if the team named in the title wins in the specified match. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "NO." If either team loses by forfeit, disqualification, or walkover for any reason, this market will resolve to the team declared the winner, regardless of whether the match has started or when the decision is made. If the match is not completed with an official result by August 4, 2026, 23:59 UTC, the market will resolve to "Other."
Kalshi and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under distinct market rules, user bases, and liquidity conditions. Kalshi may attract traders with different risk appetites or information sets than Limitless, causing their respective prices to drift apart. Platform-specific fees, minimum order sizes, and withdrawal policies also influence how aggressively traders commit capital. Additionally, one platform may see larger informed trading activity around esports events, while the other draws more casual predictors. These structural differences mean identical outcomes can trade at slightly different probabilities, creating arbitrage opportunities for alert traders.
Key catalysts include roster changes, player injuries or substitutions, recent tournament performance, and head-to-head matchup history. Patch updates to the underlying game can shift meta-game advantages, favoring one team's playstyle over the other. Pre-match interviews, team statements, or coaching changes may signal confidence or concern. Live in-game events—such as early game advantages or momentum swings during the match itself—will drive sharp repricing. Social media sentiment and professional analyst predictions can also influence retail trader positioning, creating secondary waves of price movement as the event approaches.