TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$103,397,351
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,410,176,180
399,592
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,622
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 22, 4:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Stefano Travaglia and Mariano Navone in the Swedish Open, originally scheduled for July 15, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Stefano Travaglia' if Stefano Travaglia advances against Mariano Navone. This market will resolve to 'Mariano Navone' if Mariano Navone advances against Stefano Travaglia. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Stefano Travaglia and Mariano Navone in the Swedish Open, originally scheduled for July 15, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Stefano Travaglia' if Stefano Travaglia advances against Mariano Navone. This market will resolve to 'Mariano Navone' if Mariano Navone advances against Stefano Travaglia. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction markets and sportsbooks price outcomes differently because they operate on distinct mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous buying and selling. This market reflects what thousands of participants collectively believe will happen, often incorporating real-time information faster than traditional sportsbooks update their lines. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus differs and highlight potential value.
On Polymarket, this market is priced through an automated market maker that adjusts odds based on order flow and share inventory. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Traders purchase shares representing each possible outcome, and the price of each share reflects the collective probability assigned by the market. As more capital flows into one outcome, its price rises and the competing outcome's price falls, ensuring prices stay responsive to new information and trader conviction throughout the trading window.
This market resolves around Jul 22, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official result of the tennis match between these two players at the Swedish Open. Resolution happens automatically once the event is confirmed, and all shares are settled according to the actual winner.
Several factors can shift odds before the match takes place. Recent player performance, injury reports, head-to-head records, and court surface suitability all influence trader positioning. Weather conditions, seeding changes, or unexpected withdrawals can trigger sharp moves. Tournament momentum—how each player performed in earlier rounds—often drives late trading activity. Media coverage and expert commentary may also sway sentiment, especially if new analysis highlights overlooked advantages or concerns about either competitor's form or matchup dynamics.