TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
São Paulo FC vs. CA Paranaense
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of São Paulo FC vs. CA Paranaense?

Volume:
$806,112

Paranaense

 - Kalshi

Paranaense - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 23, 2026

Closed: Jul 22, 10:25 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Paranaense

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$176,812
N/A
N/A
$104,324
Settled
Yes
polymarket

CA Paranaense

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$81,366
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Sao Paulo

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$226,603
N/A
N/A
$135,191
Settled
No
polymarket

São Paulo FC

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$217,904
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$89,151
N/A
N/A
$64,799
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (São Paulo FC vs. CA Paranaense)

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14,276
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Intro

This market tracks who will win the Brasileiro Serie A soccer match between São Paulo FC and CA Paranaense on July 22, 2026. The aggregated consensus probability shows CA Paranaense winning at 100.0%, with São Paulo FC at 0.1%. Data comes from Polymarket and Kalshi, resolving via CBF official statistics. Watch for the final whistle on July 22, 2026, which will determine the match's official result and market resolution.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

Both Polymarket and Kalshi apply identical resolution logic: official governing body result at 90+stoppage minutes, with consistent treatment of postponements (markets remain open) and full cancellations (win markets resolve No, draw market resolves Yes).Primary resolution logic: CBF (Confederação Brasileira de Futebol) official statistics and Brasileiro Serie A governing body; if not published within 2 hours of match conclusion, credible reporting consensus may be used as secondary source.

Core resolution logic:

  • Resolution is based on the final score after 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time only; extra time and penalties are excluded.
  • Primary source is official CBF/governing body statistics; secondary source is credible reporting consensus if official stats unavailable within 2 hours of match end.
  • If match is postponed, all markets remain open until the match is completed.
  • If match is canceled entirely with no makeup game: São Paulo win market resolves No, Paranaense win market resolves No, draw market resolves Yes.
  • Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not affect the settlement outcome.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Postponement: If the match is postponed, all three markets remain open and unresolved until the match is completed on a new date.
  • Full Cancellation: If the match is canceled entirely with no makeup game scheduled, the draw market resolves Yes while both team-win markets resolve No.
  • Score Revision After Resolution: Any official score corrections made after market resolution will not be reconsidered; the market settles on the officially declared result at time of resolution.
  • Source Timing: Official CBF statistics are the primary source; if unavailable within 2 hours of match conclusion, credible reporting consensus becomes the resolution source.
Timing: Resolution occurs after the match concludes (90 minutes plus stoppage time). If official statistics are not published within 2 hours, resolution may be delayed pending credible reporting consensus. Markets remain open if postponed until the rescheduled match is completed.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming Brazil Série A game, scheduled for Wednesday, July 22, 2026 between São Paulo FC and CA Paranaense.

Kalshi

This event resolves based on the final result of the Sao Paulo vs Paranaense professional Brasileiro Serie A soccer game originally scheduled for July 22, 2026, evaluated after 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time. Extra time and penalty shootouts are not considered. Each outcome—Sao Paulo victory, Paranaense victory, or a tie—resolves to Yes if that result occurs. If the game is cancelled or rescheduled to more than two weeks after the original date, the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with Kalshi rules.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market data on the São Paulo vs. Paranaense match across Polymarket and Kalshi, two leading venues for event forecasting. Traders on both platforms are pricing the likelihood of different outcomes as the fixture approaches. The cross-platform view lets you monitor consensus odds and spot divergences between venues, giving you a complete picture of how the market is valuing each possible result. Real-time volume and price movements help you track shifting sentiment and identify trading opportunities before the match concludes.

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets are driven by trader supply and demand—meaning odds reflect aggregated belief rather than a bookmaker's margin. Prediction market prices often react faster to breaking news and tend to be more efficient over time because traders have direct financial incentive to correct mispricings. However, sportsbooks may offer tighter spreads on major events due to higher liquidity. Comparing both sources helps you identify value and understand how different communities assess the same outcome.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, regulatory frameworks, and fee structures, all of which influence how prices evolve. Polymarket and Kalshi may also have different liquidity pools, causing one venue to move faster than the other in response to news. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these gaps, but temporary divergences persist due to withdrawal delays, platform-specific trading costs, and varying user bases. Monitoring both venues helps you spot mispricings and understand which platform is leading price discovery at any given moment.

Key catalysts include team injury announcements, lineup changes, and recent form updates for both sides. Weather conditions and venue factors closer to match day often trigger repricing. Betting syndicate activity and sharp money flowing into one outcome can signal informed conviction and shift odds significantly. Media narratives around playoff implications or head-to-head history may also influence trader sentiment. Social media momentum and late-breaking tactical news can cause rapid swings in the final hours before kickoff, so monitoring both platforms continuously helps you stay ahead of market moves.