TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Senegal vs. Madagascar
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Senegal vs. Madagascar?

Volume:
$32,281

Senegal vs. Madagascar

 - Polymarket

Senegal vs. Madagascar - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 4, 2026

Closed: Jul 11, 2:00 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Senegal vs. Madagascar

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$9,175
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Senegal

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$8,040
N/A
N/A
$7,875
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Madagascar

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$15,066
N/A
N/A
$14,275
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers the outcome of a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between Senegal and Madagascar scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT. Markets across Polymarket and Kalshi are betting on which team will win this Africa regional qualifier match.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution logic is logically contradictory, stating both Senegal and Madagascar wins resolve to Yes in what appears to be a binary market. This makes the market fundamentally unresolvable as written. Polymarket uses standard binary winner-take-all logic.Hero tip: Avoid trading Kalshi until the platform clarifies whether this is a data entry error or if the market structure is actually two separate conditional markets. Polymarket offers clear, resolvable logic and should be the reference market.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Standard binary sports resolution: Senegal win resolves to Senegal, Madagascar win resolves to Madagascar. Postponement keeps market open; cancellation with no makeup resolves 50-50. Resolution based on final score including overtime.
  • Kalshi: Contradictory logic: states both Senegal winning and Madagascar winning resolve to Yes. This is logically impossible in a binary market structure and indicates either a data entry error or undisclosed market design.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Africa game, scheduled for July 4 at 2:00PM ET: If the Senegal win, the market will resolve to "Senegal". If the Madagascar win, the market will resolve to "Madagascar". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the winner of the Madagascar vs Senegal professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes, provided the reschedule occurs within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled and not played, or rescheduled beyond two weeks, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and profit margin, while prediction markets rely on trader consensus and real-money risk. This market often reflects sharper, less-biased odds because traders directly profit from accuracy rather than volume. Sportsbook odds may include juice or vig that widens the spread, whereas prediction markets typically tighten around fair value. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbook lines can reveal mispricing opportunities and help you gauge which venue offers better value for your view.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, all of which influence how prices evolve. Polymarket and Kalshi use distinct market mechanisms—one employs an automated market maker, the other order-book matching—which can create temporary arbitrage windows. Regulatory frameworks and settlement rules also vary by venue, sometimes causing one platform to price in tail risks the other discounts. Geographic trader concentration and platform-specific incentives further fragment pricing. Savvy traders monitor both venues for mispricings and use cross-platform spreads as a signal of underlying uncertainty or information asymmetry.

Team news—injuries, suspensions, or lineup changes—often triggers sharp price moves, especially for key players. Recent form, head-to-head records, and weather conditions at kickoff can shift trader conviction. Major betting syndicates or institutional money entering either side may signal a shift in consensus. Social media sentiment and mainstream sports media coverage can amplify retail trader participation and volatility. Last-minute odds movement from sportsbooks sometimes precedes prediction market repricing as information cascades across venues. Monitoring team announcements, injury reports, and cross-platform volume spikes will help you stay ahead of significant price swings leading up to the match.