TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Rwanda vs. Nigeria
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Rwanda vs Nigeria?

Volume:
$42,925

Nigeria

 - Kalshi

Nigeria - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 5, 2026

Closed: Jul 5, 6:54 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Nigeria

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$6,748
N/A
N/A
$6,401
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Rwanda vs. Nigeria

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$21,984
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Rwanda

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$14,192
N/A
N/A
$13,489
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between Rwanda and Nigeria scheduled for July 5, 2026 at 5:00 AM EDT. Markets across Polymarket and Kalshi are designed to resolve based on the final outcome of this single professional matchup.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution criteria contains a logical contradiction: both Rwanda winning and Nigeria winning are specified to resolve to Yes, which is impossible in a binary market structure. This makes the Kalshi market fundamentally unresolvable as written.Hero tip: Do not trade the Kalshi market until this contradiction is clarified. The market cannot resolve correctly if both possible game outcomes map to the same resolution state. Contact Kalshi support to confirm whether the market should be Yes/No (with No representing cancellation or other outcomes) or if this is a data entry error. Use Polymarket as your primary reference for this event.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome resolution with three explicit states: Rwanda win resolves to Rwanda, Nigeria win resolves to Nigeria, cancellation without makeup resolves 50-50. Postponement keeps market open. Final score including overtime determines result.
  • Kalshi: Dual-Yes resolution structure: If Rwanda wins then Yes; If Nigeria wins then Yes. This creates logical impossibility—both mutually exclusive game outcomes cannot both resolve to Yes in a binary market.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Africa game, scheduled for July 5 at 5:00AM ET: If the Rwanda win, the market will resolve to "Rwanda". If the Nigeria win, the market will resolve to "Nigeria". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final result of the Nigeria vs Rwanda professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game originally scheduled for July 5, 2026 at 5:00 AM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and resolves after the rescheduled game concludes, provided the reschedule occurs within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled and not played, or if rescheduling extends beyond two weeks, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events through fundamentally different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds based on internal models and risk management, then adjust for volume and liability. Prediction markets like those tracked here rely on continuous trader participation—odds emerge from buy-and-sell pressure rather than a bookmaker's discretion. This market often reflects sharper, real-time consensus because traders have direct financial incentive to correct mispricings. Sportsbook odds may lag during fast-moving news cycles, whereas prediction market prices typically adjust within minutes. Comparing the two can reveal where public perception diverges from professional assessment.

Polymarket and Kalshi operate under distinct rule sets, fee structures, and user bases, which naturally produces pricing spreads. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Liquidity depth varies between platforms—one may have deeper order books, reducing slippage and tightening odds. Settlement timelines and outcome verification procedures also differ; traders on each platform price in their own operational risk. Geographic restrictions, minimum trade sizes, and platform-specific incentives further fragment pricing. These gaps typically close as arbitrageurs exploit them, but during low-volume periods or breaking news, spreads can widen. Monitoring both venues helps you execute at the best available price and understand which platform's traders hold stronger conviction.