TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$85,014,378

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,391,695,592

394,774

Markets across

30,069

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,615

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Qatar vs. China
polymarket
kalshi

Qatar vs. China

Volume:
$147,731

China (-15.5)

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Kalshi

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Aug 27, 2026

Closed: Aug 27, 3:41 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

China (-15.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$33,777
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

China

View
100%
18%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$24,025
N/A
N/A
$19,393
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Qatar vs. China

View
0%
18%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$55,710
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Qatar

View
0%
19%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$33,073
N/A
N/A
$25,580
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 166.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,145
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 5

Description

This event group covers the outcome of the FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between Qatar and China, scheduled for August 27, 2026. The markets will resolve based on which team wins the game, with specific rules for postponements and cancellations.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Market structure mismatch between binary outcome (Polymarket) and ambiguous Yes/No format (Kalshi)Hero tip: Traders on Kalshi should seek clarification on whether 'Yes' corresponds to Qatar or China winning, as the current market design lacks specificity compared to Polymarket's clear binary outcome.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Resolves to Qatar if Qatar wins, China if China wins, 50-50 if canceled, remains open if postponed. Outcome determined by final score including overtime.
  • Kalshi: Resolves to Yes if either Qatar or China wins, but market design does not specify which team corresponds to 'Yes', creating ambiguity in outcome mapping.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Asia game, scheduled for August 27 at 6:00AM ET: If the Qatar win, the market will resolve to "Qatar". If the China win, the market will resolve to "China". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

The market resolves to Yes if the specified team wins the China vs Qatar men's professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game scheduled for August 27, 2026, at 12:00 PM EDT. If the game is postponed but begins within 48 hours of the original start time, the market stays open and resolves based on the official result. If the game is cancelled or does not start within 48 hours, all markets resolve to a fair price. Kalshi is not connected to the Governing League, and all trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Frequently asked questions

The dashboard for the Qatar vs. China football match market aggregates activity across multiple venues, showing how traders on different platforms price the likelihood of each possible result. It displays total volume of $147,731 and 24-hour volume of $138,512, letting you see where interest is concentrated and compare the consensus view against platform-specific trends.