TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Pittsburgh vs New England: 4th Quarter Both Teams to Score
kalshi

What is the result of Pittsburgh vs New England?

Volume:
$163

Both teams to score in the 4th quarter

 - Kalshi

Both teams to score in the 4th quarter - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 20, 2026

Closed: Sep 20, 4:00 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Both teams to score in the 4th quarter

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$163
N/A
N/A
$162
Settled
No
Total markets: 1

Description

In the upcoming Pittsburgh vs New England football game, both teams will attempt to score points during the final quarter of play. The outcome depends on whether each squad manages to put points on the board in that specific period.

Kalshi

If Pittsburgh and New England both score points in the 4th quarter (excluding overtime) of the Pittsburgh vs New England Pro Football game originally scheduled for Sep 20, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the NFL scoring market tracks the current price of the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ outcomes for whether both teams will score in the fourth quarter of the Pittsburgh versus New England game. It also displays the 24-hour trading volume, which is currently $3, and the total volume traded to date, amounting to $163. You’ll find a price history chart to visualize how the market has moved over time, giving you insight into trader sentiment. This allows users to monitor the evolving probabilities as reflected by real-money trading activity.

Typically, prediction market odds reflect the wisdom of the crowd and can differ from traditional sportsbook odds. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own analysis and aim to balance action on both sides, while this market aggregates the beliefs of many individual traders. Often, prediction markets are seen as more accurate forecasters of event outcomes, especially when compared to initial polling data or expert opinions. However, sportsbook odds can be useful for identifying potential value discrepancies when assessing this market, and vice-versa.

On Kalshi, this market is priced using a continuous double auction. Traders buy and sell contracts representing ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ outcomes, and the price fluctuates based on supply and demand. As more traders believe both teams will score, the price of the ‘Yes’ contract increases, and the ‘No’ contract decreases. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current price reflects the market’s aggregate probability assessment of the event occurring. This dynamic pricing mechanism allows for real-time adjustments based on new information and changing sentiment.

This market resolves around Sep 20, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Specifically, the resolution will be based on whether both the Pittsburgh and New England teams score at least one point during the fourth quarter of their game. The official game statistics will be used to determine the final result, ensuring an objective and transparent resolution process. Traders will then be paid out based on whether their chosen outcome aligns with the verified result.

Several factors could influence the price of this market. Any news regarding key player injuries on either the Pittsburgh or New England teams would likely cause significant movement. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if they suggest adverse conditions impacting scoring, could also shift trader sentiment. Furthermore, in-game performance during the first three quarters – such as dominant offensive displays or strong defensive stops – could lead to adjustments in the perceived probability of both teams scoring in the fourth quarter. Unexpected coaching decisions could also play a role.