TOTAL VOLUME:

$146.7b

24H VOL:

$162,970,420

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,781,800,361

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,740,912,349

501,518

Markets across

37,286

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,933

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

38%

VS.

Kalshi:

62%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Ole Miss vs Vanderbilt
kalshi

What is the result of Ole Miss vs Vanderbilt?

Volume:
$1,636,143

Ole Miss

 - Kalshi

Ole Miss - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 10, 2026

Closed: Oct 10, 7:14 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Ole Miss

View
100%
23%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,126,461
N/A
N/A
$660,819
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Vanderbilt

0%
24%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$509,682
N/A
N/A
$321,123
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Intro

This market tracks whether Ole Miss or Vanderbilt will win their college football game scheduled for October 10, 2026. Currently, Kalshi gives Ole Miss a 90.0% probability of winning, while Vanderbilt is at 11.0%. The market will resolve based on the outcome of the Ole Miss vs Vanderbilt college football game, as determined by which team scores more points, according to the resolution source. Keep a close watch on the game itself on October 10, 2026, as the final score will determine the market’s resolution.

Kalshi

The market resolves to Yes for the specified team if they win the college football game originally scheduled for Oct 10, 2026. If the game is postponed but begins within 48 hours of its originally scheduled start time, the market will remain open and resolve based on the official final result. If the game is cancelled or not started within 48 hours of its originally scheduled start, the market will resolve to a fair price.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Ole Miss-Vanderbilt game tracks the current odds of each outcome, including a price representing the probability of Vanderbilt winning. You can also view the price history, showing how these probabilities have shifted over time as traders buy and sell contracts. Additionally, the dashboard displays the 24-hour trading volume, which currently stands at $1,515,600, and the total volume traded to date, at $1,636,143. This provides a clear picture of market activity and sentiment surrounding the game.

Prediction market odds often reflect the 'wisdom of the crowd,' potentially differing from sportsbook odds which can be influenced by factors like house bias or initial public perception. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action, while this market allows participants to directly express their beliefs about the likelihood of each outcome. Discrepancies can arise due to differing information sources, analytical approaches, or simply variations in opinion among bettors and prediction market traders. Examining these differences can provide valuable insights into the overall expectations for the Ole Miss-Vanderbilt game.

This market resolves around Oct 10, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The resolution will be based on the official result of the Ole Miss-Vanderbilt game, as reported by a trusted sports data source. The market will determine which outcome—an Ole Miss win or a Vanderbilt win—actually occurred during the game. Traders holding contracts on the winning outcome will receive a payout, while those holding contracts on the losing outcome will not.

Several factors could influence the trading activity in this market before the Oct 10, 2026 resolution. Key injuries to star players on either the Ole Miss or Vanderbilt teams would likely cause significant shifts in the odds. Unexpected news regarding coaching strategies or team morale could also impact trader sentiment. Furthermore, any major upsets in other college football games that week might lead to a reassessment of team strengths and affect the perceived probability of each outcome in the Ole Miss-Vanderbilt game. Changes in public perception, driven by media coverage or expert analysis, can also play a role.