TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
OCS Pacific Stage 2 2026: ELMT vs. MENG GONG 3
kalshi

Who will win ELMT vs. MENG GONG 3?

Volume:
$1,904

ELMT

 - Kalshi

ELMT - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 7:59 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

ELMT

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,612
N/A
N/A
$1,425
Settled
Yes
kalshi

MENG GONG 3

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$292
N/A
N/A
$285
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

ELMT and MENG GONG 3 face off in an Overwatch match during the OCS Pacific Stage 2 2026 season. The match is scheduled for July 2, 2026, and will determine which team advances or earns points in the regional competition.

Kalshi

The market resolves based on the outcome of the OCS Pacific Stage 2 2026 Overwatch match between ELMT and MENG GONG 3 originally scheduled for July 2, 2026. One market resolves Yes if ELMT wins the match, while a separate market resolves Yes if MENG GONG 3 wins. Only one outcome can occur per match, making these mutually exclusive events.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the ELMT vs. MENG GONG esports match displays real-time odds and historical price movement as traders position themselves ahead of the matchup. You can monitor current implied probabilities, 24-hour trading volume, and order book depth to gauge market sentiment. The interface shows how confidence in each team's victory has shifted over time, helping you identify momentum and spot potential value before the event concludes. This live data reflects collective trader expectations and serves as a dynamic alternative to traditional sportsbook lines.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price events differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one derive prices from continuous trader participation and real money at stake. Traders here profit by identifying mispricings, which often makes prediction market odds more efficient at reflecting ground truth than traditional sportsbook lines. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news due to dedicated risk management teams, so comparing both sources can reveal valuable insights about where smart money is positioning itself.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where buyers and sellers submit bids and asks, and trades execute when orders match. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price you see represents the last executed trade, while the spread between the best bid and best ask shows the current cost of immediacy. As new information emerges or trader conviction shifts, the order book updates dynamically, allowing prices to move fluidly. This continuous pricing model means the market can respond quickly to roster changes, recent performance, or other catalysts that affect perceived match outcomes.

This market resolves around Jul 2, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which team wins the best-of-three series, with no ambiguity about the final score or winner. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell positions as new information and sentiment evolve. Resolution is straightforward and objective, tied directly to the official match result.

Several catalysts could shift odds before the match begins. Roster announcements, player injuries, or last-minute substitutions often trigger sharp repricing as traders reassess team strength. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and scrim performance leaks can also influence sentiment. Coaching changes, meta shifts in the game, or public statements from team leadership may sway confidence in either side. Media coverage and analyst predictions can amplify conviction among retail traders. Watch for any official statements from team management or credible esports journalists, as these tend to move this market most decisively.