TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$103,397,351
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,410,176,180
399,592
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,622
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 22, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Luca Nardi and Remy Bertola in the Nottingham 2, originally scheduled for June 15, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Luca Nardi' if Luca Nardi advances against Remy Bertola. This market will resolve to 'Remy Bertola' if Remy Bertola advances against Luca Nardi. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Luca Nardi and Remy Bertola in the Nottingham 2, originally scheduled for June 15, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Luca Nardi' if Luca Nardi advances against Remy Bertola. This market will resolve to 'Remy Bertola' if Remy Bertola advances against Luca Nardi. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market may show different implied probabilities than traditional sports betting sites, particularly if one venue has sharper information flow or different liquidity. Comparing this market's odds to major sportsbooks can reveal where consensus differs and highlight potential value opportunities for informed bettors.
On Polymarket, traders set the odds through an automated market maker that adjusts prices based on order flow and liquidity. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Each share contract trades at a price between 0 and 1, representing the implied probability of that outcome occurring. As more traders buy shares predicting one player's victory, the price rises and the opposing outcome's price falls. The spread between bid and ask prices reflects current liquidity; tighter spreads indicate more active trading, while wider spreads suggest lower volume or uncertainty among participants.
This market resolves around Jun 22, 2026, once the Nottingham 2 match concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which player wins the match—no partial or conditional scoring applies. Resolution occurs after the match is officially completed and confirmed by the tournament organizers or established sports data providers. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while shares in the losing outcome expire worthless.
Several factors may shift odds before the match concludes. Recent player performance, injury reports, or withdrawal announcements could significantly impact trader sentiment. Court conditions, weather, and head-to-head historical records often influence expectations. News about either player's form, ranking changes, or statements about their readiness may trigger buying or selling pressure. Late-breaking developments—such as lineup confirmations or tournament updates—can cause rapid repricing. As the match date approaches, increased media coverage and analyst commentary may also drive trading activity and probability adjustments.