TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$134,145,987
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,441,166,947
406,422
Markets across
30,383
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,688
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 7, 2:09 PM EST
Kalshi
This event group covers prediction markets on the outcome of a Nongshim RedForce vs. G2 Esports Valorant match scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 9:45 AM EDT during the Esports World Cup 2026. Two platforms (Kalshi and Limitless) offer binary markets on which team will win the match.
The market resolves based on the winner of the Nongshim RedForce vs. G2 Esports Valorant match scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 9:45 AM EDT during the Esports World Cup 2026. If Nongshim RedForce wins the match, their corresponding market resolves to Yes. If G2 Esports wins the match, their corresponding market resolves to Yes. The resolution is determined solely by the match outcome at the specified date and time.
This market refers to the match between Nongshim RedForce and G2 Esports in the Esports World Cup 2026, scheduled for Jul 7, 2026. This market resolves to "YES" if the team named in the title wins in the specified match. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "NO." If either team loses by forfeit, disqualification, or walkover for any reason, this market will resolve to the team declared the winner, regardless of whether the match has started or when the decision is made. If the match is not completed with an official result by August 7, 2026, 23:59 UTC, the market will resolve to "Other."
Kalshi and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform maintains its own order book and user base, so liquidity, trading volume, and participant composition vary. Kalshi and Limitless may attract traders with different information sets or risk appetites, leading to temporary price gaps. Platform-specific rules, fee structures, and settlement mechanics can also influence how traders value outcomes. These differences typically narrow as the event date approaches and arbitrageurs exploit pricing gaps, but they create opportunities for alert traders monitoring both venues simultaneously.
Key catalysts include roster changes, player injuries, recent team performance, and head-to-head records. Scrimmage results, public statements from coaches or players, and meta shifts in the game itself can shift trader sentiment. Major tournament results involving either team prior to this matchup may also influence pricing. Real-time updates during the lead-up—such as lineup confirmations or tactical analysis from credible esports media—often trigger sharp price movements as new information reaches the market.