TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$113,466,932
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,423,222,590
402,751
Markets across
30,217
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,632
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Aug 25, 10:30 PM EST
Kalshi
This event group pertains to the tennis match between Anna Bondar and Elsa Jacquemot in the Monterrey Open Qualification, originally scheduled for August 22, 2026. The markets will resolve based on the outcome of the match, including scenarios such as cancellations, retirements, or walkovers.
This market refers to the tennis match between Anna Bondar and Elsa Jacquemot in the Monterrey Open, Qualification, originally scheduled for August 22, 2026 at 6:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Anna Bondar' if Anna Bondar advances against Elsa Jacquemot. This market will resolve to 'Elsa Jacquemot' if Elsa Jacquemot advances against Anna Bondar. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 5, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
If Monterrey and Chicago Fire both score a goal in the Monterrey vs Chicago Fire Leagues Cup match originally scheduled for Aug 25, 2026 after 90 minutes plus stoppage time (does not include extra time or penalties), then the market resolves to Yes.
Prediction market odds often diverge from traditional sportsbook lines because they reflect crowd-sourced probabilities rather than set benchmarks. On Polymarket, prices adjust continuously based on trader activity, while sportsbooks may incorporate additional factors like sharp money or proprietary models. This can create pricing gaps, especially when public sentiment shifts rapidly. For this market, comparing the two gives a broader sense of where consensus may be heading.
Differences in design and user base often cause Polymarket and Kalshi to price this market differently. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For example, varying liquidity levels or distinct trader populations can skew probabilities. Each platform also applies unique fee structures, which influence how traders place bets and, consequently, the displayed odds. These mechanics mean the same event can show divergent implied probabilities across venues.
Injuries, weather updates, or last-minute player form can all shift this market. Key moments like practice session reports or changes in tournament scheduling may also influence trader sentiment. As the match approaches, any news affecting either competitor’s readiness or strategy could cause rapid adjustments in implied probabilities on both platforms.