TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
MIBR fe vs. Clutchain Female
kalshi

MIBR fe vs. Clutchain Female

Volume:
$39,006

MIBR fe

 - Kalshi

MIBR fe - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 26, 2026

Closed: Jun 25, 9:19 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

MIBR fe

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$22,410
N/A
N/A
$11,520
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Clutchain Female

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$16,595
N/A
N/A
$9,295
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

MIBR fe and Clutchain Female are competing in a Counter-Strike 2 match as part of the Rainhas do Clutch FERJEE 2026 tournament. The match is scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 6:30 PM EDT.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the outcome of the Rainhas do Clutch FERJEE 2026 CS2 match between MIBR fe and Clutchain Female scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 6:30 PM EDT. The market resolves to Yes if either MIBR fe or Clutchain Female wins the match. Each team has a corresponding market that resolves affirmatively upon their victory.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the MIBR fe vs. Clutchain Female esports match displays real-time odds and historical price movements as traders position themselves on the outcome. You can monitor current implied probabilities, 24-hour trading volume, and order book depth to gauge market sentiment. The interface shows how confidence in each team's victory has shifted over time, helping you identify momentum and spot potential value before the match concludes. These tools let you track both the consensus view and recent trading activity in one place.

Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate beliefs from traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market may show different implied probabilities than major sportsbooks, especially as new information emerges closer to the event. Comparing the two can reveal where the broader market disagrees with bookmaker consensus, though both sources provide valuable perspective on the matchup.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-matching, where buyers and sellers set the odds by placing limit and market orders. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price you see reflects the most recent trade and the depth of bids and asks at each probability level. As new information surfaces or trader conviction shifts, the price adjusts in real time. You can enter at the current spread or place orders away from the market to potentially improve your fill, giving you control over your entry point and risk.

This market resolves around Jun 26, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official match result, with no ambiguity about which team won. Until that point, traders can adjust positions as new developments emerge. Resolution is final once the event is complete and the winning team is publicly confirmed through established esports coverage.

Several factors may shift odds before the match takes place. Roster changes, player injuries, or lineup announcements from either team can significantly alter expectations. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and performance trends in the lead-up to the event often trigger repricing. Coaching changes, equipment issues, or public statements from team management may also influence trader sentiment. As the match date approaches, any credible reporting on team form or competitive standing could prompt rapid adjustments in implied probability.