TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Miami vs San Diego: 3rd Inning Winner
kalshi

Miami vs San Diego: 3rd Inning Winner

Volume:
$213

Miami wins 3rd inning

 - Kalshi

Miami wins 3rd inning - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 19, 2026

Closed: Sep 18, 10:30 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Miami wins 3rd inning

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$183
N/A
N/A
$183
Settled
Yes
kalshi

San Diego wins 3rd inning

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$30
N/A
N/A
$30
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie 3rd inning

View
N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market focuses on determining which team will score more runs in a specific inning of an upcoming baseball game between Miami and San Diego. It provides a focused way to bet on short-term performance during the contest. Outcomes depend entirely on scoring during that single inning, ignoring overall game results.

Kalshi

If Miami scores more runs in the 3rd inning of the Miami vs San Diego professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 18, 2026 at 9:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If San Diego scores more runs in the 3rd inning of the Miami vs San Diego professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 18, 2026 at 9:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If neither Miami nor San Diego scores more runs in the 3rd inning of the Miami vs San Diego professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 18, 2026 at 9:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.