TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Mexico vs. Nicaragua
kalshi
polymarket

What is the result of Mexico vs Nicaragua?

Volume:
$226,852

Mexico

 - Kalshi

Mexico - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 4, 2026

Closed: Jul 4, 12:39 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Mexico

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$65,598
N/A
N/A
$55,070
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Mexico vs. Nicaragua

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$14,436
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Nicaragua

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$146,818
N/A
N/A
$110,564
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers the outcome of a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers Americas basketball game between Mexico and Nicaragua scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 10:30 PM EDT. Markets across Polymarket and Kalshi are tracking whether Mexico or Nicaragua will win this professional qualifier match.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi market contains a logical contradiction: both Nicaragua win and Mexico win conditions are specified to resolve to Yes, making the market fundamentally unresolvable as a binary outcome.Hero tip: Trade only the Polymarket version until Kalshi issues a clarification or amendment. The Kalshi market as written cannot distinguish between the two mutually exclusive outcomes.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome market with clear resolution logic: resolves to 'Mexico' if Mexico wins, 'Nicaragua' if Nicaragua wins. Final score including overtime determines result. Postponement keeps market open; cancellation without makeup resolves 50-50.
  • Kalshi: Market structure specifies: 'If Nicaragua wins...resolves to Yes' AND 'If Mexico wins...resolves to Yes'. Both mutually exclusive outcomes map to the same resolution state, creating logical impossibility. Key quote: both conditions explicitly state 'then the market resolves to Yes'.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Americas game, scheduled for July 3 at 10:30PM ET: If the Mexico win, the market will resolve to "Mexico". If the Nicaragua win, the market will resolve to "Nicaragua". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

The market resolves based on the winner of the Nicaragua vs Mexico professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 10:30 PM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes, provided the reschedule occurs within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled or rescheduled beyond two weeks, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market data on the Mexico vs. Nicaragua football match across Polymarket and Kalshi, two leading platforms where traders price the outcome in real time. The aggregate view shows consensus odds alongside individual platform snapshots, letting you compare how each marketplace is valuing the result. By tracking both venues simultaneously, you gain insight into where smart money is concentrating and whether one platform is pricing the match differently than the other. This cross-platform lens helps identify potential value and market consensus as the event approaches.

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events using different mechanisms and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets rely on trader consensus—each participant buys and sells shares based on their own conviction. This often makes prediction markets more efficient at discovering true probability, especially for niche or less-liquid events. However, sportsbooks may offer tighter spreads and faster liquidity in mainstream matchups. Comparing this market's odds to your preferred sportsbook can reveal discrepancies worth exploiting if you have an edge.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different odds on the same event for several reasons. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which influences how prices evolve. Polymarket may have deeper liquidity in one outcome, while Kalshi draws more volume on another. Additionally, platform-specific rules around trading hours, minimum order sizes, and settlement timelines can create temporary arbitrage windows. Monitoring both venues helps you spot mispricings and understand which platform's consensus is more reliable for this particular matchup.