TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch: Total Games
kalshi

Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch: Total Games

Volume:
$396

Over 18.5 games

 - Kalshi

Over 18.5 games - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 24, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 9:07 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 18.5 games

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$109
N/A
N/A
$109
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 23.5 games

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$184
N/A
N/A
$184
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 28.5 games

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$103
N/A
N/A
$103
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market covers the total number of games played in the professional tennis match between Max Basing and Tom Gentzsch during the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Round 2 on June 24. Bettors predict whether the match will extend beyond certain game thresholds.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the total number of completed games across the full match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to fair price. Postponed or delayed matches remain open until the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are resolved to fair market price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the Basing vs Gentzsch total games market dashboard displays real-time odds and price movements for the predicted number of games in this matchup. The interface tracks current market probability, historical price trends, and trading volume to help you monitor how traders are positioning around the total games outcome. This dashboard gives you a live snapshot of consensus expectations, updated continuously as new trades execute. You can use these metrics to compare current market sentiment against your own analysis or external forecasts.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven purely by trader belief and capital allocation. Prediction markets typically incorporate real-time information more fluidly and can adjust faster to breaking news. However, sportsbooks may have sharper early lines due to professional oddsmakers. Comparing the two can reveal where public opinion on this matchup differs from professional consensus.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-book trading, where buyers and sellers submit bids and offers that determine the current odds. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price reflects the marginal trader's willingness to buy or sell at that moment, aggregating dispersed information across all active participants. As new information emerges or trader conviction shifts, the bid-ask spread widens or tightens accordingly. You can enter limit or market orders to trade at your preferred price, and the market's price discovery mechanism ensures that odds stay aligned with real-time expectations.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the matchup concludes and the total number of games is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by counting the actual games played between the two competitors. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell positions as new information and developments influence expectations. Resolution is final once the event data is confirmed and locked into the platform.

Several factors could shift odds in this market before resolution. Injury announcements or roster changes affecting either competitor's performance capability would likely trigger repricing. Recent form, head-to-head history, or updated expert analysis could also sway trader positioning. Venue conditions, weather, or scheduling adjustments might influence expectations about match length. Public betting trends and sharp money flowing into one side can create momentum. Any credible reporting about either player's readiness or competitive status would be closely watched by active traders and could prompt rapid market movement.