TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch: Set 1 Winner
kalshi

Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch: Set 1 Winner

Volume:
$4,720

Max Basing

 - Kalshi

Max Basing - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 24, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 7:08 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Max Basing

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$2,801
N/A
N/A
$2,288
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Tom Gentzsch

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,919
N/A
N/A
$1,324
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

This market concerns the outcome of the first set in a professional tennis match between Max Basing and Tom Gentzsch at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Round 2 on June 24. Bettors are predicting which player will win that specific set.

Kalshi

The market resolves based on which player wins set 1 of the Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch match at 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Round 2. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open until the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot be settled resolve to Fair Market Price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Basing vs Gentzsch Set 1 market displays real-time odds reflecting trader conviction about whether Max Basing will win the opening set of their match. The interface shows current price movements, historical price trends, and 24-hour trading volume. These metrics help traders monitor sentiment shifts and liquidity as the event approaches. The dashboard updates continuously, allowing you to track how market expectations evolve based on new information, player form, or pre-match developments. Volume and price history provide context for assessing market depth and confidence levels among participants.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate distributed trader beliefs in real time. This market's odds may move faster or differently than traditional sportsbooks, especially as new information emerges closer to the match. Comparing the two can reveal where one venue perceives edge or mispricing. Prediction markets tend to incorporate late-breaking developments more dynamically, whereas sportsbooks adjust more cautiously to protect their books.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order-book mechanism where traders buy and sell shares representing yes or no outcomes. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current price reflects the marginal cost of the next share traded, with the spread between bid and ask representing liquidity depth. Traders profit by correctly predicting the set winner, and prices adjust in real time as new orders flow in. Higher prices indicate stronger market belief in that outcome, while lower prices suggest skepticism. The mechanism ensures prices remain responsive to fresh information and trader conviction throughout the market's lifetime.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the Max Basing versus Tom Gentzsch match concludes and the set result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official match record—specifically, which player wins the first set. Resolution occurs after the event is confirmed through reliable reporting, ensuring accuracy before payouts are finalized. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while incorrect positions expire worthless. The timing allows for proper verification before settlement.

Several factors may shift odds before resolution. Player injury announcements or withdrawal news would dramatically reprrice expectations. Recent form updates, head-to-head record analysis, or surface-condition changes could influence trader positioning. Pre-match commentary from analysts or coaching staff may trigger buying or selling waves. Weather forecasts, if relevant to outdoor play, could affect strategy and confidence. Betting action from sharp bettors or institutional traders often signals new information. As match day approaches, late-breaking lineup confirmations or player fitness updates typically drive final price adjustments. Real-time momentum during warm-ups may also influence last-minute trading activity.