TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch: Exact Match Score
kalshi

Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch: Exact Match Score

Volume:
$352

Max Basing wins 2-0

 - Kalshi

Max Basing wins 2-0 - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 24, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 9:07 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Max Basing wins 2-0

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$266
N/A
N/A
$244
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Max Basing wins 2-1

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$34
N/A
N/A
$34
Settled
No
kalshi

Tom Gentzsch wins 2-1

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$26
N/A
N/A
$26
Settled
No
kalshi

Tom Gentzsch wins 2-0

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$26
N/A
N/A
$26
Settled
No
Total markets: 4

Description

Max Basing and Tom Gentzsch will compete in the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Round 2. These markets track the exact final set score of their professional tennis match, with separate outcomes for each possible result.

Kalshi

This event covers the Max Basing vs Tom Gentzsch professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Men Singles Qualification Round 2. Each market resolves to Yes if the specified exact set score outcome occurs. If the match does not begin due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, all markets resolve to fair price. Postponed or delayed matches remain open and close after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play will resolve accordingly; those that cannot be unconditionally determined will resolve to Fair Market Price at the Exchange's sole discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the Basing vs Gentzsch exact score market dashboard tracks real-time odds and price movements for this prediction market. The interface displays current trading activity, allowing you to monitor how the market is pricing the likelihood of different exact-score outcomes between these two competitors. You can view historical price data and 24-hour volume metrics to understand trading patterns and liquidity. This dashboard serves as your window into how traders are collectively assessing the probability of each possible final score, updated continuously as new trades execute on the platform.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different pricing mechanisms and trader bases. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are priced by traders directly betting their capital on outcomes. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more efficient pricing because traders have strong financial incentives to identify mispricings. However, sportsbooks may have deeper liquidity and tighter spreads on major events. Comparing the two can reveal valuable insights: if this market's odds deviate significantly from sportsbook lines, it may signal where informed traders see value or where one venue has less accurate information.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order-book mechanism where traders submit bids and asks for each possible exact-score outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of any outcome reflects the balance between buyers and sellers at any given moment. As new information emerges or trader sentiment shifts, the bid-ask spread adjusts dynamically. Kalshi's pricing model rewards traders who identify mispricings early, creating an incentive structure that often produces efficient, real-time probability estimates. The more active trading volume this market attracts, the tighter and more reliable its price signals typically become.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the event concludes and the final exact score is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the actual score recorded at the end of the match between Basing and Gentzsch. Resolution hinges on confirming the precise final tally—any ambiguity or dispute would be resolved by reference to authoritative sports records. Traders should monitor official announcements and reliable sports data sources as the event date approaches to stay informed about any potential complications or clarifications that might affect how the market settles.

Several factors could shift odds in this market before resolution. Recent form, injury reports, or roster changes involving either competitor may trigger significant repricing as traders reassess win probabilities and likely scoring patterns. Public statements from coaches or analysts could sway sentiment. As the event date approaches, media coverage and expert predictions often influence trader behavior. Betting patterns on related markets—such as match winner or total points—can also cascade into exact-score pricing. Closer to Jun 24, 2026, late-breaking news or lineup confirmations typically drive the final adjustments. Monitoring sports news and trading volume spikes will help you anticipate and react to these movements.