TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara
polymarket
limitless

What is the result of XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara?

Volume:
$6,347

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara

 - Polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 3, 2026

Closed: Sep 3, 4:25 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5,272
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Alexei Popyrin vs Alejandro Tabilo

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
99.9¢
N/A
$1,074
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 2 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 1 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Total Sets: O/U 2.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Match O/U 21.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 2 Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 2 O/U 9.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Match O/U 22.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 1 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 2 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Match O/U 23.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Wuning: XIAOYIN YANG vs Harrison Satara Set 1 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This group resolves to the outcome of a tennis match between XIAOYIN YANG and Harrison Satara in the M15 Wuning tournament. The markets ask who will advance in the match. Resolution depends on official match results or, in cases of cancellation or non-completion, specific rules regarding walkovers, retirements, and deadlines.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All platforms share consistent resolution criteria regarding match completion, cancellation, retirement, and walkovers.Primary resolution logic: International Tennis Federation (ITF) official statistics and reporting.

Core resolution logic:

  • The market resolves to the player who advances in the match.
  • If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or a winner is not determined within 14 days of the scheduled start, the market resolves to 50-50.
  • Retirement, default, or disqualification results in resolution to the advancing player.
  • A walkover results in a 50-50 resolution.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Match Not Completed: If the match begins but is not completed, resolution depends on whether a player advances due to opponent retirement, default, or disqualification. Otherwise, the market resolves based on the cancellation/tie rules.
  • Delayed Match: If the match is delayed beyond the specified timeframe (14 days from the scheduled start), it resolves to 50-50 regardless of the reason for the delay.
Timing: Resolution will occur once the official results are published by the ITF, or after the 14-day deadline has passed without a winner being determined.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between XIAOYIN YANG and Harrison Satara in the M15 Wuning, Main Draw, originally scheduled for September 2, 2026 at 11:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'XIAOYIN YANG' if XIAOYIN YANG advances against Harrison Satara. This market will resolve to 'Harrison Satara' if Harrison Satara advances against XIAOYIN YANG. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Limitless

This market refers to the tennis match between Alexei Popyrin and Alejandro Tabilo in the ATP US Open, originally scheduled for September 2, 2026 at 15:00 UTC. This market will resolve to 'Alexei Popyrin' if Alexei Popyrin advances against Alejandro Tabilo. This market will resolve to 'Alejandro Tabilo' if Alejandro Tabilo advances against Alexei Popyrin. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.

Frequently asked questions

On PredictionHero, this dashboard aggregates forecasts for the Wuning tennis match across multiple platforms, including Polymarket and Limitless. It displays a consensus view of the probabilities for each player winning, derived from the combined volume of $6,347 traded on these venues. Currently, the dashboard does not show a clear leader, as the probabilities are still evolving. We track the 24-hour volume at $5,272 to gauge market activity. This allows users to see how opinions are shifting in real-time and compare the collective wisdom of prediction markets to traditional odds.

Prediction market odds, like those displayed for this market, often reflect a more accurate assessment of probabilities than traditional sportsbook odds. This is because prediction markets incentivize participants to reveal their true beliefs, while sportsbooks may incorporate biases or profit margins into their pricing. However, sportsbook odds are readily available and widely followed, providing a useful point of comparison. Discrepancies can arise due to differing levels of information, market efficiency, and the types of bettors participating on each platform. Observing these differences can reveal potential value opportunities for informed traders.