TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim
opinion
limitless
polymarket

Who will win Nishesh Basavareddy vs Tristan Schoolkate?

Volume:
$7,539

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim

 - Polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 2, 2026

Closed: Sep 2, 5:09 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$7,466
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Nishesh Basavareddy vs Tristan Schoolkate

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
99.8¢
N/A
$72
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
opinion

Nishesh Basavareddy vs Tristan Schoolkate

N/A
N/A
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Total Sets: O/U 2.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

M15 Hurghada: Jake Fellows vs Karim Ibrahim Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 18

Description

This group centers on a tennis match between Jake Fellows and Karim Ibrahim in the M15 Hurghada tournament. The markets ask whether either player will advance (Polymarket) or whether the match will be completed (Polymarket - secondary question).

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: The markets diverge in their core question: one asks about who advances, the other asks if the match is completed. A retirement or default will resolve differently on each.Hero tip: Consider the likelihood of a retirement or default when trading the 'advancement' market. The 'completion' market is more sensitive to disruptions and incomplete matches.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket (Advancement): Resolves to the player who advances, even with retirement/default. Resolves to 50-50 if match is canceled or no winner by September 16, 2026.
  • Polymarket (Completion): Resolves to 'Yes' only if the match is fully completed. Resolves to 'No' if incomplete (retirement, default, walkover, cancellation, or no winner by September 16, 2026).
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Jake Fellows and Karim Ibrahim in the M15 Hurghada, Main Draw, originally scheduled for September 2, 2026 at 2:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Jake Fellows' if Jake Fellows advances against Karim Ibrahim. This market will resolve to 'Karim Ibrahim' if Karim Ibrahim advances against Jake Fellows. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Limitless

This market refers to the tennis match between Nishesh Basavareddy and Tristan Schoolkate in the ATP US Open, originally scheduled for August 30, 2026 at 15:00 UTC. This market will resolve to 'Nishesh Basavareddy' if Nishesh Basavareddy advances against Tristan Schoolkate. This market will resolve to 'Tristan Schoolkate' if Tristan Schoolkate advances against Nishesh Basavareddy. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.

Opinion

In the upcoming ATP singles match scheduled for 2026-09-01 15:05 UTC: if Nishesh Basavareddy wins the match, this market resolves to "Nishesh Basavareddy"; if Tristan Schoolkate wins, it resolves to "Tristan Schoolkate". The winner is the first player to claim the required number of sets under the match's official best-of format. If the match begins but is not completed, a retirement or default counts the opposing player as the winner. If a walkover is declared before the first point is played, the match is outright canceled, or it is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. Suspensions caused by weather, fading light, or other tournament-imposed delays do not close this market — it stays open until the match is officially completed, provided it concludes within the 7-day window mentioned above. Resolution Source: The official ATP Tour scoring page. Note: This market will resolve strictly based on the first officially published result from the designated source. Any subsequent revisions will not affect this resolution.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction market odds, like those found in this market, often reflect the collective wisdom of a diverse group of forecasters, potentially offering a different perspective than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set lines based on models and internal risk assessments, while this market is driven by individuals putting their capital at risk. This can lead to discrepancies, especially when public sentiment diverges from expert opinion. It's common to see prediction markets incorporate information more quickly than sportsbooks, particularly regarding factors not easily quantifiable. The volume of $7,539 suggests significant interest in this event.

Prices for this market may differ between Limitless and Opinion due to variations in user base, trading activity, and information available to traders on each platform. Limitless and Opinion can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For example, Limitless might attract more informed traders specializing in this sport, leading to more efficient price discovery, while Opinion could have a broader audience with less specific knowledge. Differences in trading fees, market-making algorithms, or even the time of day can also contribute to price discrepancies. These variations are normal and reflect the independent nature of each platform's market.