TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Sep 2, 5:09 AM EST
Polymarket
This group centers on a tennis match between Jake Fellows and Karim Ibrahim in the M15 Hurghada tournament. The markets ask whether either player will advance (Polymarket) or whether the match will be completed (Polymarket - secondary question).
This market refers to the tennis match between Jake Fellows and Karim Ibrahim in the M15 Hurghada, Main Draw, originally scheduled for September 2, 2026 at 2:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Jake Fellows' if Jake Fellows advances against Karim Ibrahim. This market will resolve to 'Karim Ibrahim' if Karim Ibrahim advances against Jake Fellows. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Nishesh Basavareddy and Tristan Schoolkate in the ATP US Open, originally scheduled for August 30, 2026 at 15:00 UTC. This market will resolve to 'Nishesh Basavareddy' if Nishesh Basavareddy advances against Tristan Schoolkate. This market will resolve to 'Tristan Schoolkate' if Tristan Schoolkate advances against Nishesh Basavareddy. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
In the upcoming ATP singles match scheduled for 2026-09-01 15:05 UTC: if Nishesh Basavareddy wins the match, this market resolves to "Nishesh Basavareddy"; if Tristan Schoolkate wins, it resolves to "Tristan Schoolkate". The winner is the first player to claim the required number of sets under the match's official best-of format. If the match begins but is not completed, a retirement or default counts the opposing player as the winner. If a walkover is declared before the first point is played, the match is outright canceled, or it is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. Suspensions caused by weather, fading light, or other tournament-imposed delays do not close this market — it stays open until the match is officially completed, provided it concludes within the 7-day window mentioned above. Resolution Source: The official ATP Tour scoring page. Note: This market will resolve strictly based on the first officially published result from the designated source. Any subsequent revisions will not affect this resolution.
Prices for this market may differ between Limitless and Opinion due to variations in user base, trading activity, and information available to traders on each platform. Limitless and Opinion can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For example, Limitless might attract more informed traders specializing in this sport, leading to more efficient price discovery, while Opinion could have a broader audience with less specific knowledge. Differences in trading fees, market-making algorithms, or even the time of day can also contribute to price discrepancies. These variations are normal and reflect the independent nature of each platform's market.