TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Kwibuka T20 Tournament, Women: Brazil vs Malawi
polymarket
kalshi

Kwibuka T20 Tournament, Women: Brazil vs Malawi

Volume:
$31,769

Brazil

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 12, 2026

Closed: Jun 12, 7:12 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Brazil

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$10,969
N/A
N/A
$7,385
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Kwibuka T20 Tournament, Women: Brazil vs Malawi

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$9,059
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Kwibuka T20 Tournament, Women: Brazil vs Malawi - Completed match?

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
94¢
N/A
$162
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Malawi

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$11,375
N/A
N/A
$8,271
Settled
No
polymarket

Kwibuka T20 Tournament, Women: Brazil vs Malawi - Who wins the toss?

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$204
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 5

Description

This event group covers the women's T20 cricket match between Brazil and Malawi scheduled for June 12, 2026 at the Kwibuka T20 Tournament. Markets track the match winner, toss winner, and match completion status, with resolution based on official ESPNCricinfo records.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi match winner market contains a logical contradiction where both Brazil win and Malawi win conditions resolve to Yes, making the market fundamentally unresolvable. Polymarket match winner market is logically consistent with standard binary resolution.Hero tip: Do not trade the Kalshi match winner market in its current form. The resolution logic is broken and cannot distinguish outcomes. Use Polymarket for match winner exposure. Toss winner and match completion markets on Polymarket are sound and can be traded with confidence.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Match winner market states: If Brazil wins resolves Yes, If Malawi wins resolves Yes. This creates a logical impossibility where both mutually exclusive outcomes map to the same resolution. No explicit No condition is defined. Quote: 'If Brazil wins...resolves to Yes. If Malawi wins...resolves to Yes.'
  • Polymarket: Match winner market uses standard binary logic with unified tiebreak protocol: Super Over determines winner if available under playing conditions; if no tiebreak available, resolves 50-50. Cancellation/abandonment also resolves 50-50. Quote: 'If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the cricket match between Brazil and Malawi scheduled for June 12 2026 in Kwibuka T20 Tournament, Women. This market resolves according to the finalized match result as published by https://www.espncricinfo.com/. DLS/DRS, over-rate penalties, forfeit/walkover, or any other on-field ruling that leads the competition to declare a winner are treated as ordinary wins. If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available under the playing conditions (e.g., group-stage ODI with no Super Over), the market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed/rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed. If the match is permanently canceled or abandoned or otherwise is completed without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Kalshi

If the match ends in a tie, draw, no result, abandonment, or cancellation with no official winner declared, all markets resolve to $0.50. If a forfeit, disqualification, or concession occurs before the match begins, markets resolve to $0.50. If such an event occurs after play has begun and the governing body declares an official winner, the market resolves based on that result. If play begins but insufficient play occurs to determine an official result, all markets resolve to $0.50.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price events differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. This market's odds reflect what thousands of participants collectively believe will happen, often incorporating faster-moving information than traditional sportsbooks. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbook lines can reveal where consensus diverges from bookmaker pricing.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which naturally creates pricing gaps. Kalshi and Polymarket may also have slightly different market mechanics, settlement windows, or user bases with varying risk appetites. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these spreads, but temporary divergences persist due to geographic restrictions, platform-specific trading costs, and information asymmetries. Monitoring both venues helps you identify which platform's price better reflects true consensus.

Key catalysts include team roster announcements, injury updates to star players, recent form and head-to-head records, weather conditions at the venue, and any last-minute lineup changes. Betting syndicates and sharp traders often move the line in the hours before first pitch based on these factors. Social media sentiment, expert predictions, and betting volume spikes can also shift implied probabilities. Monitor sports news outlets and official team channels for developments that might influence how this market reprices before the match begins.