TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Jordan vs. Syria
predict
polymarket

What is the result of Jordan vs. Syria?

Volume:
$46,522

Draw (Jordan vs. Syria)

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Predict

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 27, 2026

Closed: Sep 27, 5:20 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Draw (Jordan vs. Syria)

View
100%
77%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5,070
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
predict

Draw

99%
76%
Yes 99¢No 1¢
—
$6,940
$4,944
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
predict

JOR

1%
62%
Yes 1¢No 99¢
—
$566
$13,856
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Jordan

0%
62%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$8,829
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
predict

SYR

1%
14%
Yes 1¢No 99¢
—
$72
$4,814
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Syria

0%
14%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$9,010
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Description

This group forecasts the outcome of a FIFA International Friendly match between Jordan and Syria on September 27, 2026. Markets exist for Jordan winning, Syria winning, and the game ending in a draw. All platforms specify resolution based on official match statistics, with fallback sources.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All platforms utilize the same core resolution logic and source hierarchy for determining the match outcome.Primary resolution logic: Official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers (FIFA).

Core resolution logic:

  • Resolution is based on the outcome within the first 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time.
  • If the game is postponed, the market remains open until completion.
  • If the game is canceled entirely, the 'Jordan win' and 'Syria win' markets resolve to 'No', and the 'Draw' market resolves to 'Yes'.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Data Availability: If official statistics are unavailable within 2 hours, Flashscore is used. If Flashscore is unavailable, Sofascore is used. If neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting is used. If no acceptable data is available within 24 hours, the market resolves 50-50 (or to 'Draw' where applicable).
  • Score Revisions: Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.
Timing: Resolution will occur as soon as official match statistics are available, with a maximum delay of 24 hours after the event's conclusion.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming FIFA International Friendlies game, scheduled for Sunday, September 27, 2026 between Jordan and Syria.

Predict

This event is for the upcoming FIFA International Friendlies game, scheduled for Sunday, September 27, 2026 between Jordan and Syria.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction market odds, like those seen on this market, often reflect the wisdom of the crowd, potentially offering a more accurate forecast than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and ensure profit, incorporating a margin for themselves. Prediction markets, however, allow traders to directly express their beliefs, leading to odds that more closely represent the true probability of an event. Discrepancies can arise due to differing information access, biases, or simply variations in the participants involved. Comparing these odds can reveal valuable insights into public perception and potential value bets.