TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,590,312

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,439,516,703

404,175

Markets across

30,277

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,685

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Jesper De Jong vs Rinky Hijikata: Set 2 Winner
kalshi

Who will win Set 2: De Jong vs Hijikata?

Volume:
$20,269

Rinky Hijikata

 - Kalshi

Rinky Hijikata - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 29, 2026

Closed: Jun 29, 3:31 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Rinky Hijikata

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$11,125
N/A
N/A
$7,311
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Jesper De Jong

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$9,144
N/A
N/A
$8,308
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

This market determines the winner of the second set in the professional tennis match between Jesper De Jong and Rinky Hijikata at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Round of 128 on June 29. The outcome depends on which player wins the second set during regulation play.

Kalshi

The market resolves based on which player wins set 2 in the Jesper De Jong vs Rinky Hijikata match at 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Round of 128. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. If postponed or delayed, the market remains open until the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are resolved to Fair Market Price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the De Jong vs Hijikata Set 2 market dashboard displays real-time odds and price movements for this tennis matchup. Traders can monitor the current implied probability for each player to win the second set, along with historical price charts showing how sentiment has shifted over time. The interface also shows 24-hour trading volume and liquidity depth, helping participants gauge market activity and execution costs. This live data enables informed decision-making as new information about player form, conditions, or match developments emerges.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. This market may show materially different implied probabilities than traditional sports betting sites, especially if informed traders have conviction on one side. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus differs and highlight potential value opportunities for sharp bettors.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where traders buy and sell contracts representing each outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each contract reflects the collective belief about the likelihood of that player winning Set 2, ranging from near-zero to near-100 cents. As new trades execute, prices adjust in real time to balance supply and demand. Wider bid-ask spreads indicate lower liquidity, while tighter spreads suggest active trading and deeper market depth.

This market resolves around Jun 29, 2026, once the De Jong vs Hijikata match concludes and the Set 2 winner is confirmed. The outcome will be verified against credible public sources covering professional tennis results. Traders holding contracts for the winning player will receive full payout, while contracts for the losing player expire worthless. Early resolution is possible if the match is abandoned or the set is not completed under standard rules.

Several factors may shift odds in this market before it resolves. Recent form and head-to-head records between the players can influence trader positioning. Court surface, weather conditions, and match scheduling details often trigger repricing as the event approaches. Injury reports or player withdrawals would cause sharp moves. During the match itself, Set 1 outcome and momentum swings typically drive significant trading activity. News about player fitness or mental state can also sway market sentiment in the hours leading up to Set 2.