TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Jaime Faria vs Luka Pavlovic: Total Games
kalshi

Jaime Faria vs Luka Pavlovic: Total Games

Volume:
$1,844

Over 19.5 games

 - Kalshi

Over 19.5 games - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 24, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 12:06 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 19.5 games

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,551
N/A
N/A
$1,551
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 24.5 games

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$187
N/A
N/A
$187
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 29.5 games

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$106
N/A
N/A
$106
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market tracks the total number of games played in the professional tennis match between Jaime Faria and Luka Pavlovic at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Final on June 24. Bettors can wager on whether the match will exceed various game thresholds.

Kalshi

The event resolves based on the total number of completed games across the full match between Jaime Faria and Luka Pavlovic at the 2026 Wimbledon Men's Singles Qualification Final. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. If postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. Should a player retire, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are settled at Fair Market Price as determined by the Exchange at its sole discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Faria vs Pavlovic total games market displays real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the final game count. You can monitor how the market's consensus shifts throughout the trading window, review 24-hour volume activity, and track the current implied probability of different outcomes. This live data helps you understand market sentiment and identify when significant moves occur relative to news or developments surrounding the matchup.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market's odds may lead or lag traditional sportsbook lines depending on information flow and trader conviction. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd on Kalshi sees value relative to conventional betting markets, though both sources inform a complete picture of expected outcomes.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where traders directly set bid and ask prices for shares representing different game-count outcomes. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the collective willingness of buyers and sellers to transact at that level, with tighter spreads indicating higher confidence and liquidity. As new information emerges or trader sentiment shifts, prices adjust dynamically to equilibrate supply and demand across all possible outcomes.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the matchup concludes and the final game count is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the total number of games played in the Faria versus Pavlovic event, with the result confirmed against official records. Traders holding shares in the correct outcome receive their payout once resolution is finalized and the market settles.

Several factors could shift odds in this market before Jun 24, 2026. Injury announcements, changes in player form or recent performance, betting-market activity, and expert commentary on matchup dynamics all influence trader positioning. Unexpected roster changes, scheduling adjustments, or shifts in public perception about either competitor's readiness can trigger sharp repricing. Additionally, early-round results or head-to-head records released closer to the event date often prompt significant volume and volatility as traders update their forecasts.