TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Jack Pinnington Jones vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli: Total Games
kalshi

Jack Pinnington Jones vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli: Total Games

Volume:
$3,810

Over 17.5 games

 - Kalshi

Over 17.5 games - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 22, 2026

Closed: Jun 22, 4:02 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 17.5 games

View
72%
Yes 72¢No 28¢
100¢
N/A
$1
N/A
N/A
$1
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 22.5 games

46%
Yes 46¢No 54¢
100¢
N/A
$3,809
N/A
N/A
$3,515
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 27.5 games

N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market tracks the total number of games played in the professional tennis match between Jack Pinnington Jones and Camilo Ugo Carabelli at the 2026 ATP Eastbourne Round of 32 on June 22. Bettors can wager on whether the match will exceed various game thresholds.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the total number of completed games in the full match. The match must be signaled by a ball being played to be considered as occurring; if it does not occur due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation before play begins, the market resolves to fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot be unconditionally settled resolve to fair market price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Pinnington Jones vs Carabelli total games market displays real-time odds and historical price movement as traders position themselves on the expected number of games in this matchup. You can monitor current implied probability, 24-hour trading volume, and order book depth to gauge market sentiment. The interface updates continuously, allowing you to track how consensus shifts as new information emerges about player form, conditions, or other relevant factors leading up to the event.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate decentralized trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. This market may show different implied probabilities than traditional sportsbooks, especially as new developments emerge. Comparing the two can reveal where professional oddsmakers and distributed traders disagree on the likely outcome.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-book trading, where buyers and sellers submit bids and asks that determine the real-time odds. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Traders profit by correctly predicting the total number of games, and the price reflects the collective confidence of all active participants. As new information surfaces or positions shift, the market reprices instantly, ensuring the odds stay aligned with current expectations.

This market resolves around Jun 22, 2026, once the event concludes and the total number of games is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the actual game count recorded in official records or widely reported sports data. Until that point, traders can buy and sell positions, and the market price will fluctuate based on evolving expectations and any developments that might influence the final tally.

Several factors could shift this market significantly. Injury announcements or changes in player availability might alter expectations about match duration. Recent form, head-to-head history, or surface conditions could influence how traders assess the likely number of games. Media reports, expert commentary, or betting patterns on related markets may also trigger repricing. As the event date approaches, any official updates or scheduling changes would likely prompt sharp moves in the odds.