TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov
polymarket

Who will win the ITF Umag match: Ligniere or Sekachov?

Volume:
$394

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov

 - Polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 30, 2026

Closed: Jul 7, 10:30 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$366
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$23
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Umag: Edoardo Cherie Ligniere vs Glib Sekachov Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Edoardo Cherie Ligniere and Glib Sekachov in the ITF Men Umag, originally scheduled for June 30, 2026 at 10:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Edoardo Cherie Ligniere' if Edoardo Cherie Ligniere advances against Glib Sekachov. This market will resolve to 'Glib Sekachov' if Glib Sekachov advances against Edoardo Cherie Ligniere. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Edoardo Cherie Ligniere and Glib Sekachov in the ITF Men Umag, originally scheduled for June 30, 2026 at 10:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Edoardo Cherie Ligniere' if Edoardo Cherie Ligniere advances against Glib Sekachov. This market will resolve to 'Glib Sekachov' if Glib Sekachov advances against Edoardo Cherie Ligniere. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the ITF Umag men's tennis match tracks real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor the current probability estimate, historical price charts, and trading activity to see how market sentiment shifts as the event approaches. The interface displays the leading outcome alongside its implied likelihood, giving you a transparent view of how the crowd is pricing this specific matchup between the two competitors.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven by trader consensus and real money at stake. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more efficient pricing because participants are directly rewarded for accuracy rather than betting against a fixed spread. Comparing the two can reveal where public opinion and professional oddsmakers disagree on this match.

On Polymarket, traders set prices through an automated market maker that adjusts odds based on buy and sell volume. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current implied probability reflects the aggregate belief of all active traders at any given moment. As more capital flows into one outcome, the price shifts accordingly, creating a dynamic market that responds to new information, player news, or betting patterns. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the odds stay aligned with evolving expectations about the match result.

This market resolves around Jul 7, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official match result, determining which player won. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares as new information emerges or circumstances change. Resolution happens automatically once the event is finalized and confirmed through established sports data sources.

Several factors could shift odds before the match takes place. Player injury announcements, recent performance trends, or changes in ranking points at stake can trigger significant repricing. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, or head-to-head history becoming relevant in trader discussions may also influence sentiment. News about either competitor's form, confidence, or preparation could prompt traders to adjust their positions. Even casual social media momentum or expert commentary can sway the crowd's collective assessment of the likely winner.