TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,590,312
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,439,516,703
404,175
Markets across
30,277
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,685
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 14, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Federica Urgesi and Lucija Ciric Bagaric in the ITF Women The Hague, originally scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Federica Urgesi' if Federica Urgesi advances against Lucija Ciric Bagaric. This market will resolve to 'Lucija Ciric Bagaric' if Lucija Ciric Bagaric advances against Federica Urgesi. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Federica Urgesi and Lucija Ciric Bagaric in the ITF Women The Hague, originally scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Federica Urgesi' if Federica Urgesi advances against Lucija Ciric Bagaric. This market will resolve to 'Lucija Ciric Bagaric' if Lucija Ciric Bagaric advances against Federica Urgesi. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines based on professional oddsmakers' analysis and manage risk through margin, while prediction markets derive prices from trader consensus and real-money incentives. This market aggregates the collective judgment of many participants betting their own capital, which can sometimes identify value that traditional sportsbooks miss. However, sportsbooks benefit from deeper historical data and specialized expertise. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd and professionals disagree on the likely outcome.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the cumulative trades placed by the community, with shares ranging from near-zero to near-certain. As more capital flows toward one outcome, its price rises and the alternative falls, creating a dynamic equilibrium. This mechanism ensures that prices adjust instantly to new information, news, or shifts in trader conviction, making the market responsive and transparent throughout the trading period.
This market resolves around Jul 14, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The winning outcome will be determined by the actual result of the match—either Urgesi or Ciric Bagaric will emerge victorious. Once the match concludes and the result is established through reliable sources, the market will settle accordingly, paying out traders who held the correct outcome shares. Until that point, prices will continue to fluctuate based on trader expectations and any new developments affecting either player's prospects.
Several factors could shift prices before resolution. Injury reports or fitness updates on either player may trigger sharp moves, as physical condition directly impacts performance. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and court surface preference can influence trader positioning. News about player form, coaching changes, or external circumstances affecting either competitor will likely prompt repricing. Betting activity from informed traders—particularly those with insider knowledge of player status—often signals conviction and can accelerate price movement. As the match date approaches, anticipation and final confirmation of participation will also drive trading volume and volatility.