TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
ITF Slovenska Bistrica: Lucio Ratti vs Vincent Dullinger
- Polymarket
ITF Slovenska Bistrica: Lucio Ratti vs Vincent Dullinger - Polymarket
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Vol.
·
Resolved Jun 26, 2026
Closed: Jul 3, 4:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Lucio Ratti and Vincent Dullinger in the ITF Men Slovenska Bistrica, originally scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Lucio Ratti' if Lucio Ratti advances against Vincent Dullinger. This market will resolve to 'Vincent Dullinger' if Vincent Dullinger advances against Lucio Ratti. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Lucio Ratti and Vincent Dullinger in the ITF Men Slovenska Bistrica, originally scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Lucio Ratti' if Lucio Ratti advances against Vincent Dullinger. This market will resolve to 'Vincent Dullinger' if Vincent Dullinger advances against Lucio Ratti. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and protect their margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven by traders seeking profit through accurate forecasting. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more efficient pricing because traders have direct financial exposure to outcomes. However, sportsbook odds may incorporate additional factors like injury reports or late-breaking news. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus differs and highlight potential value opportunities.
On Polymarket, traders set the odds through an automated market maker mechanism where buying or selling shares moves the price based on available liquidity. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the aggregate belief of all active traders at any given moment. As new information emerges or sentiment shifts, traders adjust their positions, causing the probability to fluctuate. This continuous price discovery process means the market remains responsive to developments leading up to the match, allowing you to enter or exit positions at prices that reflect real-time expectations.
This market resolves around Jul 3, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome will reflect which player wins the ITF Slovenska Bistrica event. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome will receive their payout, while those on the losing side will receive nothing. The resolution process is designed to be transparent and based on widely reported match results, ensuring all participants can independently verify the final outcome.
Several factors could shift trader sentiment before resolution. Recent performance by either player, including wins or losses in warm-up tournaments, often influences expectations. Injury announcements or fitness concerns can dramatically alter the perceived probability of each outcome. Court surface preferences, head-to-head history, and current ranking trends also drive trading activity. Media coverage highlighting one player's form or momentum may prompt rapid repricing. Additionally, any official updates from the tournament organizers or changes to match scheduling could trigger market movement as traders reassess their positions.