TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$130,522,377
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,438,389,636
404,028
Markets across
30,214
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,681
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 14, 8:30 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Enzo Kohlmann and Luis Jose Nakamine in the ITF Men San Salvador De Jujuy, originally scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 8:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Enzo Kohlmann' if Enzo Kohlmann advances against Luis Jose Nakamine. This market will resolve to 'Luis Jose Nakamine' if Luis Jose Nakamine advances against Enzo Kohlmann. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Enzo Kohlmann and Luis Jose Nakamine in the ITF Men San Salvador De Jujuy, originally scheduled for July 7, 2026 at 8:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Enzo Kohlmann' if Enzo Kohlmann advances against Luis Jose Nakamine. This market will resolve to 'Luis Jose Nakamine' if Luis Jose Nakamine advances against Enzo Kohlmann. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they operate under different incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage risk, while prediction markets reflect the aggregated beliefs of many independent traders competing for profit. This market may show different implied probabilities than traditional sports betting sites, especially as new information surfaces or trader conviction shifts. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd sees value or where consensus differs from professional oddsmakers.
On Polymarket, traders set the odds through an automated market maker that adjusts prices based on buy and sell volume. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The more traders believe one outcome will occur, the higher its price climbs; conversely, reduced demand lowers it. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market reflects up-to-date expectations. Shares are fractional, allowing precise position sizing, and the spread between bid and ask prices tightens as liquidity increases, making it easier to enter or exit positions at fair rates.
This market resolves around Jul 14, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome will reflect the official winner of the ITF San Salvador De Jujuy event between these two players. Traders holding shares in the correct outcome receive their payout, while incorrect positions expire worthless. Resolution typically occurs within hours of the final point, pending confirmation from the tournament organizers and news coverage.
Several factors could shift trader sentiment before the match begins. Injury reports or withdrawal announcements would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, or changes in player ranking could influence confidence in either competitor. Court conditions, weather forecasts, or scheduling delays may also prompt recalibration. Social media discussion, expert commentary, or betting patterns from other venues can signal new information that traders incorporate into their positions. Late-breaking news about either player's form or readiness typically generates the most volatile price swings.