TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,590,312
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,439,516,703
404,175
Markets across
30,277
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,685
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 2, 9:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Tatum Evans and Ayana Akli in the ITF Women Rome, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 9:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Tatum Evans' if Tatum Evans advances against Ayana Akli. This market will resolve to 'Ayana Akli' if Ayana Akli advances against Tatum Evans. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Tatum Evans and Ayana Akli in the ITF Women Rome, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 9:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Tatum Evans' if Tatum Evans advances against Ayana Akli. This market will resolve to 'Ayana Akli' if Ayana Akli advances against Tatum Evans. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate beliefs from traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market may show higher or lower implied probabilities than traditional sportsbooks depending on where informed traders believe the true likelihood lies. Comparing the two can reveal whether consensus leans bullish or bearish relative to professional oddsmakers.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current top outcome reflects strong trader conviction, with pricing updated continuously as new positions enter and exit the market. Shares cost between $0 and $1, and the price at any moment represents the crowd's aggregated estimate of that outcome's probability. Higher prices indicate greater confidence; lower prices suggest skepticism or uncertainty.
This market resolves around Jul 2, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The resolution hinges on the actual result of the match as documented by official tournament records and reputable sports news sources. Once the match concludes and the winner is established beyond dispute, the market will settle accordingly, paying out holders of the correct outcome shares at full value.
Player form, recent match results, head-to-head history, and injury reports are key catalysts that can shift odds significantly. Court conditions, weather, and draw positioning may also influence trader sentiment. News about either player's fitness, mental state, or preparation leading into the tournament can trigger sharp repricing. Close matches or unexpected upsets elsewhere in the draw may alter perceptions of competitive strength, causing traders to reassess probabilities and adjust their positions accordingly.