TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$87,997,338
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,395,155,069
395,664
Markets across
30,076
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,626
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 8, 5:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Niklas Schell and Yannik Kelm in the ITF Men Nivelles, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Niklas Schell' if Niklas Schell advances against Yannik Kelm. This market will resolve to 'Yannik Kelm' if Yannik Kelm advances against Niklas Schell. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Niklas Schell and Yannik Kelm in the ITF Men Nivelles, originally scheduled for July 1, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Niklas Schell' if Niklas Schell advances against Yannik Kelm. This market will resolve to 'Yannik Kelm' if Yannik Kelm advances against Niklas Schell. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets like this one are driven by trader consensus without a built-in house edge. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper pricing on niche events because they aggregate dispersed information from many participants. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news due to dedicated risk management teams. Comparing the two can reveal where one venue undervalues or overvalues an outcome relative to the other.
On Polymarket, traders set the price of this market through an automated market maker or order-book mechanism, where each share represents a claim on one outcome. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current implied probability reflects the aggregate of all buy and sell orders at any moment. As new information surfaces—such as player form, injury reports, or head-to-head history—traders adjust their positions, moving the price up or down. Liquidity and trading volume influence how quickly prices respond to news and how tight the bid-ask spread remains.
This market resolves around Jul 8, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official match result, confirmed through established tennis reporting channels and tournament records. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares based on their expectations. Resolution is automatic once the event is finalized, and all positions settle according to the confirmed winner.
Several factors could shift trader sentiment before the match begins. Injury announcements or withdrawal news involving either player would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and surface-specific performance data often influence odds as traders update their models. Court conditions, weather forecasts, and scheduling changes can also matter. Media coverage highlighting form or momentum may sway casual traders, while professional bettors might react to shifts in sportsbook lines. Any official statement from the players or tournament organizers could prompt rapid position adjustments in this market.