TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric

Volume:
$5,844

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric

 - Polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 12, 2026

Closed: Jun 19, 7:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5,780
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Total Sets: O/U 2.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$64
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 1 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Merzig: Eva Bennemann vs Pia Lovric Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Eva Bennemann and Pia Lovric in the ITF Women Merzig, originally scheduled for June 12, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Eva Bennemann' if Eva Bennemann advances against Pia Lovric. This market will resolve to 'Pia Lovric' if Pia Lovric advances against Eva Bennemann. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Eva Bennemann and Pia Lovric in the ITF Women Merzig, originally scheduled for June 12, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Eva Bennemann' if Eva Bennemann advances against Pia Lovric. This market will resolve to 'Pia Lovric' if Pia Lovric advances against Eva Bennemann. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Bennemann vs Lovric tennis match displays real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor the current probability of each player winning, track historical price trends, and view trading volume to gauge market interest. The interface shows how sentiment has shifted over time, helping you understand whether confidence in either competitor has grown or declined. This live data reflects the collective assessment of prediction market participants actively trading on the platform.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven by traders seeking to profit from accurate forecasts. Prediction markets typically incorporate real-time information more efficiently, as participants have direct financial stakes in accuracy. However, sportsbooks may offer deeper liquidity and tighter spreads in some cases. Comparing the two can reveal where the broader market sees value relative to professional oddsmakers.

On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares, with the current market price reflecting the aggregate belief in each result. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The more capital flowing toward one outcome, the higher its price rises, and vice versa. Prices range from near zero to one dollar, where one dollar represents near-certainty. This continuous price discovery mechanism means odds update instantly as new information emerges or trader sentiment shifts, creating a dynamic and transparent market for the match.

This market resolves around Jun 19, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will reflect which player wins the ITF Merzig event. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares based on their expectations. Resolution is final once the match is officially confirmed, and payouts are distributed accordingly to holders of the winning outcome.

Several factors may shift trader sentiment before Jun 19, 2026. Recent form and head-to-head records between the two players can influence confidence in either outcome. Injury reports or player withdrawals would dramatically alter odds. Court conditions, weather, and tournament draw updates may also sway expectations. Media coverage, expert commentary, and betting patterns on other platforms can cascade into this market as traders react to new information. Close matches or upsets in earlier rounds may reshape perceptions of either player's momentum heading into this fixture.