TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov

Volume:
$1,122

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov

 - Polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 10, 6:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,117
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 1 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 2 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Marburg: Saba Purtseladze vs Daniel Siniakov Set 1 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Saba Purtseladze and Daniel Siniakov in the ITF Men Marburg, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Saba Purtseladze' if Saba Purtseladze advances against Daniel Siniakov. This market will resolve to 'Daniel Siniakov' if Daniel Siniakov advances against Saba Purtseladze. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Saba Purtseladze and Daniel Siniakov in the ITF Men Marburg, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Saba Purtseladze' if Saba Purtseladze advances against Daniel Siniakov. This market will resolve to 'Daniel Siniakov' if Daniel Siniakov advances against Saba Purtseladze. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Purtseladze vs Siniakov tennis match displays real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor the current probability implied by the market, historical price charts showing how sentiment has shifted, and trading activity. The interface lets you track which outcome is favored and how conviction has evolved leading up to the event. This live data reflects collective trader expectations based on player form, head-to-head records, and court conditions at the ITF Marburg tournament.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they operate under different incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets are driven purely by trader belief and capital allocation. This market aggregates the views of many independent traders with real money at stake, which can surface information faster than traditional oddsmakers. However, sportsbooks may incorporate sharper professional betting syndicates and real-time liability management. Comparing the two can reveal where public sentiment on this match differs from professional consensus.

On Polymarket, traders set the price of this market through an automated market maker that adjusts odds based on buy and sell volume. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Each outcome is represented as a tradeable share, and the combined probability of all shares always sums to 100 percent. When more traders buy shares predicting one player's victory, that outcome's price rises and the opposing outcome falls. The spread between bid and ask prices reflects liquidity and uncertainty; tighter spreads indicate higher confidence and deeper order books, while wider spreads suggest lower trading activity or greater disagreement among participants.

This market resolves around Jul 10, 2026, once the ITF Marburg match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which player wins the match in straight sets or after dropping a set. Resolution occurs after the final point is played and the official result is confirmed by the tournament organizers or established tennis databases. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while shares in the losing outcome expire worthless.

Several factors could shift odds before the match begins. Recent tournament results and player rankings provide form indicators that traders monitor closely. Injury announcements or withdrawal news would trigger sharp repricing. Court surface conditions at the Marburg venue and weather forecasts may favor one player's style over the other. Head-to-head history and performance trends in similar tournaments influence trader positioning. Betting syndicates or sharp money entering the market can also move prices suddenly. Late-breaking news about player fitness or mental state often causes volatility in the final hours before play starts.