TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson
polymarket
limitless

Who will win Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson?

Volume:
$6,789

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson

 - Polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Aug 13, 2026

Closed: Aug 13, 10:05 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$6,778
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$11
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
limitless

Nuno Borges vs Thanasi Kokkinakis

View
N/A
N/A
99.6¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 1 Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 2 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Total Sets: O/U 2.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Match O/U 21.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 2 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 1 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 2 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Match O/U 22.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 1 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Match O/U 23.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF M15 Malmö Men: Didrik Liljekvist vs Jan Simonsson Set 2 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This event group pertains to the tennis match between Didrik Liljekvist and Jan Simonsson in the ITF M15 Malmö Men tournament. The markets will resolve based on the outcome of the match, including scenarios such as cancellations, retirements, or walkovers.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All markets consistently use ITF as the primary resolution source and share identical rules for match completion, cancellations, retirements, disqualifications, and walkovers.Primary resolution logic: Official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF)

Core resolution logic:

  • The market resolves to the winning player if the match concludes normally.
  • If the match is canceled, ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days without a winner, it resolves to 50-50 or 'No'.
  • If a player advances due to opponent retirement, default, or disqualification, the advancing player wins.
  • Walkovers result in a 50-50 or 'No' resolution.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Retirement During Match: Resolves to the player who advances due to the opponent's retirement.
  • Walkover: Resolves to 50-50 or 'No' depending on the market.
  • Match Delayed Beyond 7 Days: Resolves to 50-50 or 'No' if no winner is determined.
Timing: Resolution occurs once the ITF officially confirms the match result, or within 2 hours after the event's conclusion if official statistics are not yet published, using credible reporting as a secondary source.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Didrik Liljekvist and Jan Simonsson in the ITF M15 Malmö Men, originally scheduled for August 13, 2026 at 6:15AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Didrik Liljekvist' if Didrik Liljekvist advances against Jan Simonsson. This market will resolve to 'Jan Simonsson' if Jan Simonsson advances against Didrik Liljekvist. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Limitless

This market refers to the tennis match between Nuno Borges and Thanasi Kokkinakis in the ATP Cincinnati Open, originally scheduled for August 13, 2026 at 14:00 UTC. This market will resolve to 'Nuno Borges' if Nuno Borges advances against Thanasi Kokkinakis. This market will resolve to 'Thanasi Kokkinakis' if Thanasi Kokkinakis advances against Nuno Borges. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction market odds on this market reflect trader sentiment and can diverge noticeably from traditional sportsbook lines. While sportsbooks may set their odds based on analytics and historical performance, prediction markets price in live information and crowd wisdom, often resulting in different implied probabilities. For example, a shift in player form or weather conditions can move this market more quickly than sportsbook adjustments.

On Polymarket and Limitless, prices can vary due to differences in user bases, liquidity, and trading activity. Polymarket and Limitless can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform’s unique pool of traders may have distinct views on the competitors’ current form, injury status, or even local support, shaping their odds independently. These factors combine to create divergent probability assessments, especially in lower-volume events like this market.