TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win Milic vs Plans?

Volume:
$19,602

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans

 - Polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 9, 2026

Closed: Jul 15, 7:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$3,473
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Ognjen Milic

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,166
N/A
N/A
$1,037
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Jorge Plans

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$14,894
N/A
N/A
$12,044
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kursumlijska Banja: Ognjen Milic vs Jorge Plans Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 17

Description

This event group covers a professional tennis match between Ognjen Milic and Jorge Plans at the ITF Men's M15 Kursumlijska Banja tournament, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 7:00 AM ET. The group includes 15 related markets spanning match winner, set winners, game totals, and completion status across Polymarket and Kalshi platforms.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket enforces strict completion and edge-case logic with 7-day delays and walkover protections, while Kalshi uses a minimal ball-in-play trigger that may resolve incomplete matches as Yes.Hero tip: For match-winner markets, Polymarket offers stronger protection against walkovers and delays. Kalshi's simpler rule means retirements after play begins will likely resolve Yes for the advancing player, even if the match was incomplete. Align your position based on whether you expect a clean finish or potential disruption.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Detailed ruleset with explicit edge cases: walkover = 50-50, retirement/default after play = advancing player wins, cancellation = 50-50, delay beyond 7 days = 50-50. Completion markets require all sets/games to finish normally. Key Quote: 'If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.'
  • Kalshi: Minimal binary framework: Yes if either player wins after a ball is played. No explicit handling of walkovers, retirements, or delays. Key Quote: 'If Ognjen Milic wins the Milic vs Plans professional tennis match in the 2026 M15 Kursumlijska Banja Round of 32 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Ognjen Milic and Jorge Plans in the ITF Men Kursumlijska Banja, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ognjen Milic' if Ognjen Milic advances against Jorge Plans. This market will resolve to 'Jorge Plans' if Jorge Plans advances against Ognjen Milic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

The match must begin with a ball being played to be considered official. If the match does not occur before play starts due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, all related markets resolve to $0.50. If a player withdraws or forfeits after the match has begun, that player's market resolves to No. If the match is postponed or delayed, markets remain open and will close following the rescheduled match completion within two weeks.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market data on the Milic vs Plans tennis match across Polymarket and Kalshi, two major platforms where traders forecast the outcome. The aggregated view combines real-time odds, trading volume, and consensus probability across both venues, giving you a unified snapshot of how the market is pricing this ITF Kursumlijska Banja encounter. Combined volume across platforms reflects active interest in the matchup, with Polymarket and Kalshi each contributing distinct liquidity pools and trader bases to the overall market signal.

Prediction markets like these operate on crowd-sourced pricing: traders buy and sell shares based on their belief in each outcome, and the market price reflects the collective forecast. Unlike traditional sportsbooks, which set odds to balance liability and extract margin, prediction markets aggregate dispersed information from many participants. This often produces sharper, less biased estimates—especially for niche events like lower-tier tennis matches where sportsbook coverage is sparse. However, prediction market liquidity can be lower, potentially widening bid-ask spreads compared to major betting venues.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under different market-making rules, fee structures, and user bases. Polymarket and Kalshi may have varying levels of liquidity, leading to different marginal prices at any given moment. Additionally, traders on one platform may have access to different information or hold different risk tolerances, causing temporary price divergence. These gaps typically narrow as informed traders arbitrage between venues, but they can persist if transaction costs or withdrawal friction make cross-platform trading uneconomical.