TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 15, 7:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This event group covers a professional tennis match between Ognjen Milic and Jorge Plans at the ITF Men's M15 Kursumlijska Banja tournament, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 7:00 AM ET. The group includes 15 related markets spanning match winner, set winners, game totals, and completion status across Polymarket and Kalshi platforms.
This market refers to the tennis match between Ognjen Milic and Jorge Plans in the ITF Men Kursumlijska Banja, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ognjen Milic' if Ognjen Milic advances against Jorge Plans. This market will resolve to 'Jorge Plans' if Jorge Plans advances against Ognjen Milic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
The match must begin with a ball being played to be considered official. If the match does not occur before play starts due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, all related markets resolve to $0.50. If a player withdraws or forfeits after the match has begun, that player's market resolves to No. If the match is postponed or delayed, markets remain open and will close following the rescheduled match completion within two weeks.
Prediction markets like these operate on crowd-sourced pricing: traders buy and sell shares based on their belief in each outcome, and the market price reflects the collective forecast. Unlike traditional sportsbooks, which set odds to balance liability and extract margin, prediction markets aggregate dispersed information from many participants. This often produces sharper, less biased estimates—especially for niche events like lower-tier tennis matches where sportsbook coverage is sparse. However, prediction market liquidity can be lower, potentially widening bid-ask spreads compared to major betting venues.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under different market-making rules, fee structures, and user bases. Polymarket and Kalshi may have varying levels of liquidity, leading to different marginal prices at any given moment. Additionally, traders on one platform may have access to different information or hold different risk tolerances, causing temporary price divergence. These gaps typically narrow as informed traders arbitrage between venues, but they can persist if transaction costs or withdrawal friction make cross-platform trading uneconomical.