TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin

Volume:
$263

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin

 - Polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 25, 2026

Closed: Jun 25, 4:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$80
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$28
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Kayseri: Nicolas Tepmahc vs Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Nicolas Tepmahc and Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin in the ITF Men Kayseri, originally scheduled for June 18, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Nicolas Tepmahc' if Nicolas Tepmahc advances against Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin. This market will resolve to 'Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin' if Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin advances against Nicolas Tepmahc. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Nicolas Tepmahc and Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin in the ITF Men Kayseri, originally scheduled for June 18, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Nicolas Tepmahc' if Nicolas Tepmahc advances against Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin. This market will resolve to 'Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin' if Cem Christopher Kucukhuseyin advances against Nicolas Tepmahc. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Tepmahc vs Kucukhuseyin tennis match tracks real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor the current probability implied by market prices, historical price charts showing how sentiment has shifted, and trading volume over the past 24 hours. These metrics help you gauge how the prediction market community is pricing the likelihood of each potential result. The interface updates continuously, allowing you to spot momentum shifts and compare current odds against your own expectations before the event concludes.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets like this one are driven by trader consensus—real money is wagered on outcomes, creating price discovery. Prediction markets can sometimes lead sportsbooks in pricing shifts, especially when new information emerges. However, sportsbooks may offer tighter spreads or different liquidity. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbook lines can reveal where the two communities disagree, potentially signaling value or consensus breakdowns.

On Polymarket, this market is priced through an automated market maker (AMM) mechanism where traders buy and sell shares representing each outcome. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each share reflects the collective belief of all participants: as more traders buy shares for one outcome, its price rises and the implied probability increases. Conversely, selling pressure lowers the price. This continuous price discovery process means the market adjusts instantly to new information, news, or shifts in trader sentiment. The spread between bid and ask prices depends on liquidity and recent trading activity.

This market resolves around Jun 25, 2026, once the tennis match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will reflect the official match result as confirmed by the ITF or other authoritative tennis sources. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares based on their expectations. After resolution, the market will settle and shares will be redeemed according to the final outcome. Any trader holding the winning outcome receives their payout automatically.

Several factors could shift prices before Jun 25, 2026. Recent player form, head-to-head records, and injury updates are classic catalysts. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and tournament momentum can also influence trader positioning. News about either player's fitness, mental state, or recent match results may trigger repricing. Betting syndicates or sharp traders entering the market with large positions can move odds quickly. Social media sentiment and expert commentary may sway retail traders. As the match date approaches, any official announcements—such as withdrawal, format changes, or scheduling delays—would likely cause sharp volatility in this market.