TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 10, 3:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Franziska Sziedat and Mandegar Farzami in the ITF Women Kayseri, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Franziska Sziedat' if Franziska Sziedat advances against Mandegar Farzami. This market will resolve to 'Mandegar Farzami' if Mandegar Farzami advances against Franziska Sziedat. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Franziska Sziedat and Mandegar Farzami in the ITF Women Kayseri, originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Franziska Sziedat' if Franziska Sziedat advances against Mandegar Farzami. This market will resolve to 'Mandegar Farzami' if Mandegar Farzami advances against Franziska Sziedat. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different pricing mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and protect profit margins, while prediction markets are driven by trader consensus and real-money incentives to forecast accurately. This market aggregates the collective judgment of participants who profit when their predictions prove correct, which can sometimes reveal insights that traditional sportsbooks have not yet fully priced in. Comparing the two can highlight where public opinion and professional oddsmakers disagree.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current price reflects the aggregate belief about which player will win, with each share representing a claim on that outcome. As new information emerges or sentiment shifts, traders adjust their positions, moving the price up or down. The spread between bid and ask prices indicates liquidity and confidence in the market's pricing at any given moment.
This market resolves around Jul 10, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official tournament records and verified reporting from the ITF. Until that point, traders can continue to adjust positions as the event unfolds. Resolution happens automatically once the match winner is established and confirmed through standard sports data channels.
Several factors could shift prices before resolution. Recent player performance, injury reports, head-to-head records, and court conditions in Kayseri may influence trader expectations. Betting activity from informed participants can also signal confidence in one outcome over another. Tournament seeding, player rankings, and any pre-match commentary from analysts could trigger repricing. As the match date approaches, increased trading volume often reflects growing certainty or uncertainty about the likely winner, causing the odds to tighten or widen accordingly.