TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 2, 3:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Arina Kostina and Kailey Evans in the ITF Women Kamen, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Arina Kostina' if Arina Kostina advances against Kailey Evans. This market will resolve to 'Kailey Evans' if Kailey Evans advances against Arina Kostina. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Arina Kostina and Kailey Evans in the ITF Women Kamen, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Arina Kostina' if Arina Kostina advances against Kailey Evans. This market will resolve to 'Kailey Evans' if Kailey Evans advances against Arina Kostina. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage risk, while prediction markets like this one are driven by traders seeking profit through accurate forecasting. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more efficient pricing because participants have real money at stake and face direct consequences for mispricing. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news or injuries. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbook lines can reveal value opportunities for informed bettors.
On Polymarket, this market is priced through an automated market maker (AMM) mechanism where traders buy and sell outcome shares directly against a liquidity pool. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the ratio of shares in the pool, so as traders accumulate shares for one player, the cost of those shares rises and the opposing outcome becomes cheaper. This continuous pricing model ensures there is always liquidity available. The current market price translates directly into an implied probability, which updates in real time as new trades execute.
This market resolves around Jul 2, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official match result—specifically, which player wins the ITF Kamen event. Once the match is completed and the winner is publicly confirmed, the market will settle automatically, paying out traders who backed the correct outcome. Until that point, prices will continue to fluctuate as new information and match developments emerge.
Several factors could shift this market significantly before resolution. Recent form and head-to-head records between the two players often drive early trading. Injury announcements or withdrawal news would trigger sharp repricing. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and tournament seeding can influence trader sentiment. Betting syndicates and professional traders may enter based on their own analysis, moving prices substantially. Media coverage and expert commentary can sway retail participation. Additionally, any changes to the match schedule or venue could prompt recalibration. Close matches tend to see volatile pricing as new information emerges during play.