TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 24, 3:00 PM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between William Kleege and Spencer Johnson in the ITF Men Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'William Kleege' if William Kleege advances against Spencer Johnson. This market will resolve to 'Spencer Johnson' if Spencer Johnson advances against William Kleege. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between William Kleege and Spencer Johnson in the ITF Men Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'William Kleege' if William Kleege advances against Spencer Johnson. This market will resolve to 'Spencer Johnson' if Spencer Johnson advances against William Kleege. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different pricing mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets are priced by traders seeking to profit on their forecasts. This market may show materially different implied probabilities than traditional sports betting sites, especially as new information surfaces or trading volume shifts. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd on Polymarket disagrees with professional oddsmakers, though both sources carry uncertainty until the match concludes.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the collective belief of all active traders at any given moment. As more capital flows into one side, that outcome's price rises and its implied probability increases. Conversely, selling pressure lowers the price. This continuous price discovery mechanism means the market adapts quickly to breaking news, player updates, or shifts in trader conviction about who will win.
This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the match concludes and the winner is verified against credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official result of the ITF Irvine event. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares as odds fluctuate. Resolution typically occurs within hours of the final point, after which no further trading is permitted and payouts are distributed to holders of the winning outcome.
Several factors may shift odds before the match begins or during play. Injury reports or withdrawal announcements for either player would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, or surface preference data can influence trader positioning. Court conditions, weather, or scheduling changes may also matter. During the match itself, early set results and momentum swings often drive real-time trading. News coverage, expert commentary, or unexpected player form could prompt traders to reassess their positions and adjust prices accordingly.