TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson

Volume:
$847

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson

 - Polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 25, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 3:00 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$847
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 1 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: William Kleege vs Spencer Johnson Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between William Kleege and Spencer Johnson in the ITF Men Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'William Kleege' if William Kleege advances against Spencer Johnson. This market will resolve to 'Spencer Johnson' if Spencer Johnson advances against William Kleege. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between William Kleege and Spencer Johnson in the ITF Men Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'William Kleege' if William Kleege advances against Spencer Johnson. This market will resolve to 'Spencer Johnson' if Spencer Johnson advances against William Kleege. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Kleege vs Johnson tennis match displays real-time odds and price history as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor current implied probabilities, recent trading activity, and cumulative volume to gauge market sentiment. The interface updates continuously, allowing you to track how odds shift as new information emerges or as the event approaches. This live data helps traders and spectators understand which outcome the market currently favors and how conviction has evolved over time.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different pricing mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets are priced by traders seeking to profit on their forecasts. This market may show materially different implied probabilities than traditional sports betting sites, especially as new information surfaces or trading volume shifts. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd on Polymarket disagrees with professional oddsmakers, though both sources carry uncertainty until the match concludes.

On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the collective belief of all active traders at any given moment. As more capital flows into one side, that outcome's price rises and its implied probability increases. Conversely, selling pressure lowers the price. This continuous price discovery mechanism means the market adapts quickly to breaking news, player updates, or shifts in trader conviction about who will win.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the match concludes and the winner is verified against credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official result of the ITF Irvine event. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares as odds fluctuate. Resolution typically occurs within hours of the final point, after which no further trading is permitted and payouts are distributed to holders of the winning outcome.

Several factors may shift odds before the match begins or during play. Injury reports or withdrawal announcements for either player would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, or surface preference data can influence trader positioning. Court conditions, weather, or scheduling changes may also matter. During the match itself, early set results and momentum swings often drive real-time trading. News coverage, expert commentary, or unexpected player form could prompt traders to reassess their positions and adjust prices accordingly.