TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih

Volume:
$294

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih

 - Polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 25, 2026

Closed: Jun 24, 4:30 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$261
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set Handicap +/-1.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 51¢
2¢
N/A
$3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Total Sets: O/U 2.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 51¢
2¢
N/A
$2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$29
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 2 Winner

50%
Yes 50¢No 50¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 2 O/U 9.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 50¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 2 O/U 10.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 50¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Match O/U 21.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 51¢
2¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Match O/U 22.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 51¢
2¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Match O/U 23.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 51¢
2¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 1 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Irvine: Stefania Rogozinska Dzik vs Kate Fakih Set 2 O/U 8.5

50%
Yes 50¢No 50¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Stefania Rogozinska Dzik and Kate Fakih in the ITF Women Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 4:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Stefania Rogozinska Dzik' if Stefania Rogozinska Dzik advances against Kate Fakih. This market will resolve to 'Kate Fakih' if Kate Fakih advances against Stefania Rogozinska Dzik. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Stefania Rogozinska Dzik and Kate Fakih in the ITF Women Irvine, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 4:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Stefania Rogozinska Dzik' if Stefania Rogozinska Dzik advances against Kate Fakih. This market will resolve to 'Kate Fakih' if Kate Fakih advances against Stefania Rogozinska Dzik. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for this ITF Irvine matchup displays real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to each player's chances of winning. You can monitor the current implied probability for both competitors, review historical price charts, and track trading volume to gauge market interest and conviction. The interface shows how sentiment has shifted since the market opened, helping you understand whether backing or laying either player reflects current consensus among active traders on the platform.

Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven purely by trader belief and capital allocation. Prediction markets can sometimes price outcomes more efficiently when they attract informed specialists, though sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news. Comparing the two reveals whether consensus differs between professional oddsmakers and the broader prediction market community.

On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker pool. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The cost to buy a share reflects the current implied probability; as more capital flows toward one player, that outcome's price rises and the opponent's falls. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market stays responsive to new information, injuries, or shifts in trader conviction. Liquidity depth determines how much slippage you experience on larger trades.

This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the ITF Irvine match concludes and the winner is verified against credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official match result—whichever player wins the contest will be confirmed as the correct resolution. No ambiguity typically surrounds professional tennis outcomes, so resolution is usually straightforward once the event is complete and reported by recognized tennis authorities.

Key catalysts include injury announcements or player withdrawals, recent form and head-to-head records, court surface conditions at the venue, and seeding or ranking shifts. Betting action from sharp traders can also shift prices if they detect value others have missed. Weather delays or scheduling changes may alter player fatigue and preparation. As the match date approaches, any news about either competitor's fitness, mental state, or recent tournament performance will likely trigger repricing across this market.