TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$134,145,987
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,441,166,947
406,422
Markets across
30,383
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,688
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
ITF Irvine: Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta vs Emery Combs Match O/U 22.5
- Polymarket
ITF Irvine: Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta vs Emery Combs Match O/U 22.5 - Polymarket
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Vol.
·
Resolved Jun 17, 2026
Closed: Jun 23, 4:00 PM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta and Emery Combs in the ITF Women Irvine, originally scheduled for June 16, 2026 at 4:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta' if Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta advances against Emery Combs. This market will resolve to 'Emery Combs' if Emery Combs advances against Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta and Emery Combs in the ITF Women Irvine, originally scheduled for June 16, 2026 at 4:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta' if Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta advances against Emery Combs. This market will resolve to 'Emery Combs' if Emery Combs advances against Ingrid Carolina Millan Acosta. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like Polymarket aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. Traders on this market are incentivized to identify mispricing relative to true probabilities, which can create sharper odds than traditional sportsbooks offer. However, sportsbooks may incorporate real-time injury reports or late-breaking news faster in some cases. Comparing the two can reveal valuable insights: if prediction market odds are significantly higher or lower than sportsbook lines, it may signal where informed traders see edge.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Each share represents a claim on one outcome, and the price you see reflects the cumulative bets of all participants. When more traders believe one player will win, demand for that outcome's shares rises, pushing the price higher and the implied probability upward. Conversely, skepticism drives prices down. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market reflects real-time consensus as new information emerges about player form, conditions, or other factors relevant to the match.
This market resolves around Jun 23, 2026, once the ITF Irvine match between the two players concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which player wins the completed match. Resolution happens automatically once the event result is confirmed and recorded by official tennis authorities or widely recognized sports data providers. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while losing shares expire worthless. The timing ensures sufficient time for official confirmation before final settlement.
Several factors could shift odds before the match concludes. Recent tournament results or head-to-head records between the players often trigger repricing as traders reassess relative strength. Injury announcements, withdrawal news, or changes to court conditions can cause sharp moves. Pre-match commentary from analysts or coaching staff may influence trader sentiment. Playing style matchups and surface preference also matter—if one player excels on hard courts, that could sway the market. Weather forecasts closer to match day, seeding updates, or momentum from earlier rounds in the tournament can all prompt traders to adjust their positions and move the price.