TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 24, 3:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Anja Stankovic and Rositsa Dencheva in the ITF Women Haskovo, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Anja Stankovic' if Anja Stankovic advances against Rositsa Dencheva. This market will resolve to 'Rositsa Dencheva' if Rositsa Dencheva advances against Anja Stankovic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Anja Stankovic and Rositsa Dencheva in the ITF Women Haskovo, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Anja Stankovic' if Anja Stankovic advances against Rositsa Dencheva. This market will resolve to 'Rositsa Dencheva' if Rositsa Dencheva advances against Anja Stankovic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they serve different purposes and operate under different constraints. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage risk, incorporating a margin for profit. Prediction markets, by contrast, aggregate trader beliefs directly through price discovery. This market may reflect sharper or more current information than traditional sportsbooks, especially as new match data emerges. Comparing the two can reveal where public opinion and professional oddsmakers disagree, though neither is inherently more accurate.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker or order-book system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the collective probability estimate of all active traders at any moment. As new information surfaces—player form, injury reports, or head-to-head history—traders adjust their positions, moving prices up or down. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market stays responsive to real-world developments leading up to the match.
This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official match result reported by the ITF or other authoritative tennis reporting bodies. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares as odds fluctuate. Resolution is automatic once the event is finalized and the platform's verification process is complete.
Several factors could shift odds before the match takes place. Player injury announcements or withdrawal news would have immediate impact. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, or surface-specific performance data may influence trader positioning. Weather conditions at the venue, court surface changes, or last-minute lineup adjustments could also trigger repricing. Social media sentiment, expert commentary, and betting action on other platforms may cascade into this market. Any credible information about either player's form or readiness typically generates rapid trading volume and price movement.