TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 25, 7:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Peter Fajta and Gabor Hornung in the ITF Men Gyula, originally scheduled for June 18, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Peter Fajta' if Peter Fajta advances against Gabor Hornung. This market will resolve to 'Gabor Hornung' if Gabor Hornung advances against Peter Fajta. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Peter Fajta and Gabor Hornung in the ITF Men Gyula, originally scheduled for June 18, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Peter Fajta' if Peter Fajta advances against Gabor Hornung. This market will resolve to 'Gabor Hornung' if Gabor Hornung advances against Peter Fajta. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets are driven purely by trader belief and financial incentive to forecast accurately. This market aggregates the views of thousands of independent traders with real money at stake, which can sometimes surface insights before they appear in conventional betting lines. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus differs or where one venue may be mispricing relative to the other.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the ratio of shares held in the liquidity pool, so as more traders back one result, its price rises and the alternative falls. This mechanism ensures continuous pricing and allows you to enter or exit positions at transparent, real-time rates. The market's price discovery process incorporates all available information and trader conviction, making it a dynamic gauge of expected probability.
This market resolves around Jun 25, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome will reflect which player wins the ITF Gyula event. Resolution occurs after the match is officially completed and confirmed through reliable reporting. Until that point, prices will fluctuate based on pre-match analysis, player form, injury updates, and other factors traders believe influence the result.
Several factors may shift prices in this market before Jun 25, 2026. Injury announcements or fitness updates for either player could trigger sharp moves, as could recent tournament results or head-to-head record analysis. Changes in player ranking or seeding, court surface conditions at the venue, and betting action from professional traders or syndicates can all influence sentiment. Media coverage, expert commentary, and shifts in broader market liquidity may also drive repricing. Real-time match conditions—such as early-round performance by either competitor—will likely prompt significant trader repositioning as new information emerges.