TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 25, 5:30 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Adam Jilly and John Sperle in the ITF Men Gyula, originally scheduled for June 18, 2026 at 5:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Adam Jilly' if Adam Jilly advances against John Sperle. This market will resolve to 'John Sperle' if John Sperle advances against Adam Jilly. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Adam Jilly and John Sperle in the ITF Men Gyula, originally scheduled for June 18, 2026 at 5:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Adam Jilly' if Adam Jilly advances against John Sperle. This market will resolve to 'John Sperle' if John Sperle advances against Adam Jilly. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different pricing mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and protect their margins, while prediction markets like this one are priced by traders who profit from accurate forecasting. This market aggregates the collective judgment of many participants rather than a single oddsmaker, which can lead to sharper, more efficient pricing over time. Comparing the two can reveal valuable insights into where professional and retail sentiment align or differ.
On Polymarket, traders set the odds through an automated market maker that adjusts prices based on buy and sell volume. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The more traders believe in a particular outcome, the higher its price climbs; conversely, skepticism drives prices down. Each share represents a claim on that outcome, and the current price reflects the market's live probability estimate. This continuous pricing mechanism ensures liquidity and allows participants to enter or exit positions throughout the trading window.
This market resolves around Jun 25, 2026, once the tennis match concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome will be determined by the official match result, confirming which player wins. Until that point, traders can adjust their positions as new information surfaces, such as player form, injury updates, or head-to-head records. Resolution happens automatically once the event is finalized and confirmed.
Several factors could shift odds significantly before the match takes place. Injury announcements or fitness updates for either player would likely trigger sharp moves, as would recent tournament performance or changes in ranking. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and head-to-head history can all influence trader sentiment. Additionally, any news about player motivation, recent form, or tactical adjustments could prompt repricing. Close matches between similar-ranked opponents tend to see volatile trading as new information arrives.