TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova
polymarket

Who will win Ewald vs Palicova?

Volume:
$14,798

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova

 - Polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 26, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 6:30 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$14,670
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Match O/U 21.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Match O/U 22.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Match O/U 23.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Total Sets: O/U 2.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 1 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$53
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Gdansk: Weronika Ewald vs Barbora Palicova Set 2 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Weronika Ewald and Barbora Palicova in the ITF Women Gdansk, originally scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Weronika Ewald' if Weronika Ewald advances against Barbora Palicova. This market will resolve to 'Barbora Palicova' if Barbora Palicova advances against Weronika Ewald. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Weronika Ewald and Barbora Palicova in the ITF Women Gdansk, originally scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Weronika Ewald' if Weronika Ewald advances against Barbora Palicova. This market will resolve to 'Barbora Palicova' if Barbora Palicova advances against Weronika Ewald. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Ewald vs Palicova tennis match displays real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. The interface shows the current probability implied by market activity, along with historical price data that reflects how sentiment has shifted since the market opened. Traders can monitor order flow and liquidity to gauge confidence in either player's chances. The dashboard also tracks cumulative trading volume, helping participants understand market depth and participation levels throughout the event lifecycle.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets aggregate beliefs from traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market's odds may lead or lag sportsbook lines depending on information flow and trader conviction. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd on Polymarket sees edge relative to traditional betting venues, though both ultimately reflect probability estimates for the same underlying event.

On Polymarket, traders set prices through an automated market maker that adjusts odds based on order flow and share purchases. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The more capital deployed toward one outcome, the higher its price climbs, and vice versa. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market reflects real-time conviction among participants. Liquidity providers and arbitrageurs help keep prices efficient by exploiting mispricings, while the fee structure incentivizes active participation and discourages manipulation.

This market resolves around Jul 3, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by which player wins the ITF Gdansk event. Resolution hinges on official tournament records and confirmed match results, ensuring clarity and finality. Traders should monitor the event schedule and any official announcements to stay informed of timing changes or postponements that could affect settlement.

Player form and recent match results are primary catalysts—strong performances in warm-up tournaments or training can shift odds in either direction. Injury reports or withdrawal announcements would trigger sharp repricing, as would head-to-head history if the players have faced each other before. Court conditions, surface preference, and draw positioning within the tournament bracket may also influence trader positioning. Media coverage and expert commentary can sway sentiment, while late-breaking news about either competitor's fitness or mental state could prompt significant market moves closer to match day.