TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
ITF Gdansk: Mina Hodzic vs Anastasiya Sobolieva Set Handicap +/-1.5
- Polymarket
ITF Gdansk: Mina Hodzic vs Anastasiya Sobolieva Set Handicap +/-1.5 - Polymarket
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Vol.
·
Resolved Jun 27, 2026
Closed: Jul 4, 3:30 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Mina Hodzic and Anastasiya Sobolieva in the ITF Women Gdansk, originally scheduled for June 27, 2026 at 3:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Mina Hodzic' if Mina Hodzic advances against Anastasiya Sobolieva. This market will resolve to 'Anastasiya Sobolieva' if Anastasiya Sobolieva advances against Mina Hodzic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Mina Hodzic and Anastasiya Sobolieva in the ITF Women Gdansk, originally scheduled for June 27, 2026 at 3:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Mina Hodzic' if Mina Hodzic advances against Anastasiya Sobolieva. This market will resolve to 'Anastasiya Sobolieva' if Anastasiya Sobolieva advances against Mina Hodzic. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different pricing mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are priced by traders seeking to profit on accurate forecasts. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more reactive pricing because participants have direct financial incentive to correct mispricing. However, sportsbooks may incorporate additional data or longer track records. Comparing the two can reveal where public perception differs from professional oddsmaking, though each serves a distinct purpose in sports forecasting.
On Polymarket, traders set the odds by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker pool. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each share reflects the collective belief about the probability of that outcome occurring. As more traders buy shares for one player, the price rises and the implied probability increases; conversely, selling pressure lowers the price. This continuous price discovery mechanism means the market adjusts instantly to new information, breaking news, or shifts in trader conviction, creating a dynamic real-time forecast.
This market resolves around Jul 4, 2026, once the match concludes and the winner is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official result of the ITF Gdansk event between the two players. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while losing shares expire worthless. The resolution process is straightforward: whichever player wins the match triggers the corresponding outcome to settle at full value.
Several factors could shift odds before the match begins. Injury announcements or withdrawal news would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, ranking changes, or head-to-head record updates may influence trader positioning. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, or scheduling delays could also matter. Social media momentum, expert commentary, or betting syndicates entering the market might accelerate price moves. Any credible report about player form, fitness, or motivation could prompt traders to adjust their positions, creating volatility in this market's price.