TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
ITF Constanta: Edoardo De Filippo vs Sebastian Gima Set Handicap +/-1.5
- Polymarket
ITF Constanta: Edoardo De Filippo vs Sebastian Gima Set Handicap +/-1.5 - Polymarket
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Vol.
·
Resolved Jun 17, 2026
Closed: Jun 24, 3:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Edoardo De Filippo and Sebastian Gima in the ITF Men Constanta, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Edoardo De Filippo' if Edoardo De Filippo advances against Sebastian Gima. This market will resolve to 'Sebastian Gima' if Sebastian Gima advances against Edoardo De Filippo. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Edoardo De Filippo and Sebastian Gima in the ITF Men Constanta, originally scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 3:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Edoardo De Filippo' if Edoardo De Filippo advances against Sebastian Gima. This market will resolve to 'Sebastian Gima' if Sebastian Gima advances against Edoardo De Filippo. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance liability and profit margin, while prediction markets price outcomes through direct trader participation and real-money stakes. This market may show higher or lower implied probabilities than traditional sportsbooks, depending on whether informed traders or casual bettors dominate activity. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus differs or where one venue perceives edge.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker or order-book system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The implied probability of each outcome—De Filippo or Gima winning—is derived from the ratio of shares held and the total liquidity available. As new information emerges or trading volume shifts, prices adjust dynamically. Wider spreads may indicate lower liquidity or higher uncertainty, while tight spreads suggest strong consensus among active traders.
This market resolves around Jun 24, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official match result—whether De Filippo or Gima wins the ITF Constanta event. Resolution typically occurs shortly after the final point is played and confirmed by the tournament organizer or recognized tennis authority. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout once verification is complete.
Player form and recent match results are primary catalysts; a strong warm-up tournament or injury report can shift odds significantly. Court surface conditions, head-to-head history, and ranking changes may also influence trader positioning. News of lineup changes, coaching adjustments, or external factors affecting either player's preparation could trigger volatility. As the match date approaches, increased trading volume and refined information typically narrow spreads, while unexpected developments—such as a player withdrawal or weather delays—can cause sharp repricing.