TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda
polymarket

Who will win the ITF Claremont match: Driscoll or Gowda?

Volume:
$322

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Match O/U 21.5

 - Polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Match O/U 21.5 - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 25, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 2:00 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Match O/U 21.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$19
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 2 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 2 O/U 9.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 2 O/U 10.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 1 O/U 8.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$163
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 1 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$63
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 2 Winner

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ITF Claremont: Caroline Driscoll vs Thara Gowda Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 15

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Caroline Driscoll and Thara Gowda in the ITF Women Claremont, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 2:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Caroline Driscoll' if Caroline Driscoll advances against Thara Gowda. This market will resolve to 'Thara Gowda' if Thara Gowda advances against Caroline Driscoll. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Caroline Driscoll and Thara Gowda in the ITF Women Claremont, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 2:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Caroline Driscoll' if Caroline Driscoll advances against Thara Gowda. This market will resolve to 'Thara Gowda' if Thara Gowda advances against Caroline Driscoll. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Driscoll vs Gowda tennis match tracks real-time odds and price movements on outcomes tied to this ITF Claremont event. The primary contract displayed reflects trader sentiment on set-specific game totals, allowing you to monitor how the market reprices as new information emerges. The interface shows current bid-ask spreads, historical price charts, and trading activity, giving you a complete view of how the prediction market is valuing each outcome throughout the event window.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven by trader belief and real-money conviction. Comparing this market's odds to traditional sportsbook lines can reveal where informed traders see value or where public perception may be mispriced. Both sources offer useful signals, but prediction markets tend to aggregate dispersed information efficiently over time.

On Polymarket, this market is priced through an automated market maker that converts trader orders into real-time odds. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The top outcome currently reflects expectations around set-two game totals, with the contract price moving as traders buy or sell shares based on their forecasts. Liquidity and order flow directly influence the bid-ask spread; deeper liquidity typically narrows the spread and makes execution more efficient for both buyers and sellers.

This market resolves around Jul 2, 2026, once the event concludes and the outcome is verifiable from credible public reporting. The specific result—whether tied to game counts, set scores, or match winner—will be confirmed against official match records and tournament data. Resolution typically occurs within hours of the final point, allowing traders to settle positions promptly. Until that time, prices will fluctuate based on live match developments and trader updates.

Live match action is the primary driver: breaks of serve, momentum shifts, and injury timeouts can all trigger sharp repricing. Early-set performance often signals player form and confidence, prompting traders to adjust odds on later-set outcomes. Player fitness, court conditions, and head-to-head patterns may also influence pre-match positioning. As the match unfolds, real-time score updates and commentary will flow into the market, creating continuous opportunities for traders to revise their positions based on unfolding events.