TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$134,145,987
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,441,166,947
406,422
Markets across
30,383
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,688
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 8, 10:04 AM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks whether Linda Noskova will defeat Elise Mertens in their professional tennis quarterfinal match. Across Kalshi and Polymarket, the aggregated consensus shows Noskova at 85.0% to win, with Mertens at 15.0%. Resolution is determined by official ITF tournament records. Watch for the match outcome on July 8, 2026, when this quarterfinal is scheduled to be played.
This market refers to the tennis match between Beatrice Ricci and Julie Struplova in the ITF Women Buzau, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 2:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Beatrice Ricci' if Beatrice Ricci advances against Julie Struplova. This market will resolve to 'Julie Struplova' if Julie Struplova advances against Beatrice Ricci. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This event concerns the professional tennis match between Linda Noskova and Elise Mertens in the 2026 Wimbledon Women's Singles Quarterfinal. Resolution requires that a ball has been played in the match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market will resolve to a fair price per standard rules. Should the match be postponed or delayed, the market remains open and will close following the rescheduled match completion, provided this occurs within two weeks of the original date.
Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events differently due to their distinct mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets rely on trader consensus to establish prices. This market's odds may diverge from sportsbook lines because prediction traders incorporate real-time information, adjust positions dynamically, and face different incentive structures. Comparing the two can reveal where public or professional opinion differs, though prediction market prices tend to tighten closer to event resolution as uncertainty decreases.
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts distinct trader demographics, operates under different regulatory frameworks, and may have varying liquidity depths for this specific event. Kalshi and Polymarket also differ in their fee structures, user interfaces, and promotional incentives, which can influence how aggressively traders bid or ask. Price discrepancies typically narrow as the match date approaches, but temporary spreads create arbitrage opportunities for alert traders monitoring both venues simultaneously.
Player form, recent match results, head-to-head history, and injury reports can all shift market prices significantly. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and tournament draw developments may also influence trader positioning. Late-breaking news about either player's fitness, coaching changes, or psychological factors often triggers sharp repricing. As match day nears, any official announcements or media coverage highlighting one player's momentum or vulnerability can accelerate price movement across both platforms.